AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Atul Mahato – Appellant
Versus
Dharanidhar Mahato – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.
1. This application has been directed against judgment and order dated 24.09.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 3rd court Purulia in Miscellaneous Appeal no. 24 of 2015. By the impugned judgment learned court below has affirmed the judgment and order dated 30.07.2015 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Purulia in Misc. (preemption) Case no. 9 of 2000.
2. Opposite party no. 1 herein namely Dharani Dhar Mahato filed aforesaid pre-emption case contending that the suit property being R.S. Plot No. 2395 has been recorded in the names of Padok Mahato and Robi Mahato in equal share, each having eight annas share therein but since they have amicable partitioned the suit property Robi Mahato was in exclusive possession of the case plot having an area 2.72 acres and after his death the said property devolved upon his two sons i.e. the opposite parties herein namely Dharani Dhar Mahato and Prahlad Mahato and accordingly the opposite parties are the alleged co shares to each other in the said property having interest of 1.36 acres of land.
3. Further case of the pre-emptor /opposite party no.1 is that on 01.02.2000 the opposite
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.