IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, JJ.
Sk. Jayed Hossain – Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal and Others – Respondents
WPA (P) 186 of 2022
Decided On : 10-05-2022
Scheduled Tribe - Recognition of 'Majhi' community - Constitution (Scheduled Tribe) Order, 1950 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Constitution (Scheduled Tribe) Order, 1950, Article 342 - The judgment discusses the settled legal position that once the Presidential Order is issued, it can only be amended by the Legislature and Courts cannot assume jurisdiction to enter into an enquiry to determine if any particular tribe is covered in any other tribe as indicated in the Presidential Order. The court also highlights that no addition or modification in the Presidential Order is permissible.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, claiming to be a public-spirited person, filed a public interest petition alleging that the respondent authorities were not recognizing the 'Majhi' community as a Scheduled Tribe and not issuing ST certificates in their favor.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the petition, citing the settled legal position that no addition or modification in the Presidential Order is permissible.
Issues: Recognition of 'Majhi' community as a Scheduled Tribe and issuance of ST certificates.
Ratio Decidendi: The settled legal position that once the Presidential Order is issued, it can only be amended by the Legislature and Courts cannot assume jurisdiction to enter into an enquiry to determine if any particular tribe is covered in any other tribe as indicated in the Presidential Order.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed as no addition or modification in the Presidential Order is permissible.
JUDGMENT :
1. Petitioner claiming himself to be a public spirited person has filed this public interest petition. The grievance raised in the petition is that the respondent authorities are not recognizing ‘Majhi’ community as Scheduled Tribe category and thereby no issuing ST certificate in their favour.
2. Submission of learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the members of ‘Majhi’ community belong to ‘Santhal’ community, therefore, they are entitled for the Scheduled Tribe certificate.
3. The prayer has been opposed by learned Counsel for the respondents submitting that in view of the Presidential Order, the members of ‘Majhi’ community are not entitled to the certificate of ST category.
4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. The Constitution (Scheduled Tribe) Order, 1950 issued in exercise of power conferred by clause (1) of Article 342 of the Constitution of India clearly mentions in the Schedule, different tribes in various states, which are covered by the Presidential Order. So far as the State of West Bengal is concerned, ‘Majhi’ is not covered by the Presidential Order but only ‘Santhal’ is covered.
6. It is the settled position in law that once the Presidential Order is issued, it can only be amended by the Legislature and Courts cannot assume jurisdiction to enter into enquiry to determine if any particular tribe is covered in any other tribe as indicated in the Presidential Order. It has also been settled that the State Government or any authority or the Court or Tribunal are not vested with any power to modify or vary the Scheduled Tribes order.
7. In a recent judgment in the matter of State of Maharashtra and Another vs. Keshao Vishwanath Sonone and Another reported in 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1040, Hon’ble Supreme Court has considered the earlier judgments on the point and has held that:
“8. Incidentally, we may point out that the plea that the Dohar caste is a sub-caste of the Chamar caste cannot be entertained in the present proceedings in view of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. This Order has been issued by the President under Article 341 of the Constitution. Article 341(1) provides that the President may with respect to any State or Union Territory, and where it is a State, after consultation with the Governor thereof, by public notification, specify the castes, races or tribes or parts of or groups within castes, races, or tribes which shall for the purposes of this Constitution be deemed to be Scheduled Castes in relation to that State or Union Territory, as the case may be. Sub-article (2) lays down that Parliament may by law include in or exclude from the list of Scheduled Castes specified in a notification issued under clause (1) any caste, race or tribe or part of or group within any caste, race or tribe, but save as aforesaid a notification i
Bhaiya Lal v. Harikishan Singh
Palghat Jilla Thandan Smudhaya Samrakshna Samithi v. State of Kerala
B. Basavalingappa v. D. Munichinnappa
Kumari Madhuri Patil v. Addl. Commissioner, Tribal Development
No addition or modification in the Presidential Order is permissible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a person migrating from one state to another does not carry their caste status to the migrating state, even if the same caste is recognized as....
Article 14 is not meant to perpetuate illegality and it does not envisage negative equality
A person who is not aggrieved by an order issued under the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community certificates Act, 1993, does not h....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of pre-constitutional documents in establishing the genuineness of caste claims, the removal of area restrictions for Scheduled Tr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the acceptance of tribe claims based on blood relations, the relevance of pre-Independence documents, the removal of area restrictions, and the cau....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.