SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 185

PRANAY VERMA
Bulbul – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
L. C. Patne for petitioner; Ms. Bharti Lakkad, Government
Advocate for respondents.

ORDER

1. The petitioner before this Court has filed present petition being aggrieved by order dated 18.8.2020 (Annexure - P/6) by which the Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Badnawar, District Dhar, respondent No.4, has refused to issue Caste Certificate in favour of the petitioner by treating him to be belonging to Schedule Tribe and also by order dated 23.11.2020 (Annexure P/9) passed by the appellate authority, who affirmed the aforesaid impugned order.

2. The petitioner is undoubtedly a member of 'Mogia' caste and 'Mogia' caste has been included in Scheduled Tribe Category at Entry No.16 in the Presidential Notification issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh under the provisions of Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. The respondents in fact are treating the petitioner as a member belonging to Scheduled Caste.

3. Shri L.C.Patne has drawn the attention of this Court towards a judgment delivered in the case of State of M.P. & Others v. Dule Singh Solanki & Others reported in 2014(1) MPHT 331 (DB). In the aforesaid case, there was a similar controversy involved and the per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top