IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SOUMEN SEN, UDAY KUMAR, JJ.
Kasturi Sarkar - Appellant
Versus
Visva Bharati & Ors. - Respondents
MAT No. 593 of 2023 with I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023
Decided On : 27-07-2023
University Examination - Back Candidates - General Rules for University Examinations - [General Rules for University Examinations] - The court discussed the relevant rules for back candidates and the interpretation of the rule regarding the number of chances a candidate is eligible for to clear a paper. The court emphasized the need to interpret the rule in favor of the student and considered the impact of the pandemic on the candidate's ability to sit for the examination.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a student of B.A (Honours) in Comparative Religion, failed in three papers over two courses and sought the publication of her result. The university had denied her eligibility to appear in the examination for those papers based on the interpretation of the 'General Rules for University Examinations'.
Finding of the Court:
The court set aside the judgment and directed the university to reconsider the petitioner's representation for not being able to sit for the examination in 2020 due to the pandemic. The court instructed the university to consider the examination held in 2021 as the petitioner's second chance if her non-participation in 2020 is condoned.
Issues: Interpretation of the 'General Rules for University Examinations' regarding the eligibility of back candidates to appear for examinations and the impact of the pandemic on the petitioner's ability to sit for the examination.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to interpret the rules in favor of the student and considered the exceptional circumstances of the pandemic that disrupted normal life, impacting the petitioner's ability to sit for the examination.
Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of, and the university was directed to reconsider the petitioner's representation within four weeks, keeping in mind the welfare of the student.
JUDGMENT :
Soumen Sen, J.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. It is submitted that the petitioner had failed in three papers but it has been wrongly recorded as two papers in the impugned order.
3. The petitioner was a student of B.A (Honours) in Comparative Religion under Visva-Bharati.
4. The first semester examination was held in 2018. The petitioner failed in three papers spread over two courses, namely, (i) Islam: Origin and Development CC-2 under core course, (ii) Tagore Studies (English) under foundation course and (iii) Literature and the other Arts GEC-I (Comparative Literature) under Generic Elective Course. Thereafter she was allowed to sit for the said three papers again in the year 2019 along with the second semester to clear the backlog. This time also the petitioner was unsuccessful. Again in the year 2020, the examination was held for the said three papers, but the petitioner did not fill up the form. In the year 2021, the University issued admit card in favour of the petitioner for appearing in the examination of said three papers.
5. In view of the fact that her result was not published, the petitioner filed a writ petition praying for publishing the result of those papers.
6. Learned Single Judge on consideration of the relevant part of the “General Rules for University Examinations” held that she was not eligible to appear in the year 2021 in the said three papers. The relevant part of the “General Rules for University Examinations” relied upon in the impugned order is quoted below:-
7. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the first chance is availed only after a candidate fails in his/her first attempt to clear a paper. In other words the first chance would come only after a candidate has failed in the subject paper. It is submitted that she availed her fist chance only in the year 2019 when she was allowed to sit in the examination for those three back papers of the first semester along with her second semester.
8. Learned Single Judge was of the view that the petitioner failed in the said papers in 2018 thereby she lost her first chance. Accordingly, she was eligible to sit for the second chance in the year 2019 and if unsuccessful could sit for the third time in 2020 only with the approval of the Vice-Chancellor. She was given third chance in the year 2020. The petitioner did not appear and avail her third chance.
9. The relevant Rules stipulate only three consecutive chances to be given to the petitioner.
10. Learned counsel for the University has relied upon Clause(d) of the relevant regulation which reads as follows:-
(emphasis supplied)
12. The learned counsel for th
The need to interpret university examination rules in favor of the student and consider exceptional circumstances, such as the impact of the pandemic, on a student's ability to sit for examinations.
Students should not be penalized for administrative delays, and universities must provide fair opportunities for examination.
The judgment established the principle that students have a limited number of attempts within a specified span period to clear their LL.B courses, and they are not entitled to special examinations af....
The court emphasized the importance of considering a student's legitimate expectations and the impact of University rules on academic progression, especially in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Court ruled that educational institutions must act fairly and acknowledge students' legitimate expectations, particularly after allowing them to participate in examinations despite procedural discrep....
The court emphasized that the proposition that the University is precluded from holding back a result of a candidate if allowed to sit and participate in the examination is not of universal applicati....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.