Back
HARISH TANDON, BIBEK CHAUDHURI
Lakshman Chandra Bhandary – Appellant
Versus
Sunit Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harish Tandon, J.
The aforesaid applications are filed by the petitioner seeking for an initiation of the contempt proceedings for alleged violation of an order dated 08.02.2019 passed in WPCT 74 of 2016 and for filing a criminal contempt under Section 195 read with Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the Criminal Court of competent jurisdiction and for quashing and/or setting aside the document dated 24.05.2021 by which they claim, all the applicants therein, for grant of railway service in the land loser category was rejected.
2. A prelude to the aforesaid litigations can be traced when the land was acquired for railway project of the applicants and in terms of the scheme in vogue at the relevant point of time, the applicants sought for their job in the railways. Their applications were taken out before the competent authority but the same was not being moved further which constrained the applicant to move before the Tribunal. The Tribunal disposed of the same directing the authorities to consider and decide the representations filed by the applicants in accordance with law taking into consideration the Railway Board Circular dated 16.07.2010. In compliance o
The principle of fair inclusion in employment policies must be upheld, particularly in cases involving welfare schemes for land losers, despite technical qualifications.
Railway land losers policy withdrawal held prospective; pre-existing applications recommended before withdrawal entitled to consideration under earlier scheme, not retrospectively denied.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
