SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 1339

SUBHENDU SAMANTA
R. Satyanarayanamma – Appellant
Versus
R. Vijay Laxmi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rakesh Pal Gobind.
For the Respondent: K.M.B. Jayapal.

JUDGMENT :

SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J.

1. The instant civil revision has been preferred against order dated 28th June, 2023 passed by the learned District Judge, Andaman and Nicobar Islands at Port Blair in Misc. Appeal No. 03 of 2023.

2. The brief fact of the case is that the present respondent has preferred a suit before the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Port Blair for mutation, partition and declaration of right for recovery of possession of the share of the plaintiff in respect of a landed property being survey No. 3137 measuring an area of 0.0207 hectares situated at South Point Village, under Port Blair Tehsil, South Andaman District.

3. The peculiar fact of the case goes to show that the present petitioner no. 1 is the mother of the petitioner nos. 2 to 4 and the respondent. After filing of the suit, the respondent had prayed for an order of injunction before the learned Trial Court which has refused. Against the said order of refusal Misc. Appeal was preferred before the learned District Judge, Port Blair. The learned District Judge after hearing, was pleased to dismiss the application for the injunction filed in the Misc. Appeal by the respondent.

4. Being aggrieved by the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top