DEBANGSU BASAK, MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Abdul Majid – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Debangsu Basak, J.
1. Appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated July 11, 1989 and the order of sentence dated July 11, 1989 passed in Sessions Appeal No. 5(5) of 1988 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North 24 Parganas, Barasat.
2. Three persons were convicted and sentenced under Sections 304 (Part II) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for a period of three years and under Section 447 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 thereof for a period of three months. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
3. Three persons who were convicted and sentenced preferred an appeal being Criminal Appeal No. 311 of 1989. In the appeal, suo motu Rule was issued on August 14, 1989 calling upon the appellants to show cause as to why their conviction under Section 304 (part-II) should not be enhanced or such other order or further orders made as this Court may seem fit and proper.
4. During the pendency of the appeal, out of the three appellants, appellant No. 2 and appellant No. 3 expired. Their death was noted by the order dated July 29, 2024. It was also noted there that appeals of the appellant nos. 2 and 3 abetted consequent
Participation in an assault leading to death can sustain a conviction under IPC Sections 304(Part II) and 447, even if the accused did not inflict the fatal blow.
The trustworthiness of eyewitness accounts and their corroboration with medical evidence are crucial in establishing guilt in criminal cases.
Modifying conviction from murder to manslaughter due to lack of intent and premeditation, establishing a precedent for considering trivial disputes in assessing culpability.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the evidence presented by the prosecution must prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt for the offence charged, and in the absence o....
The distinction between intention and knowledge is crucial in culpable homicide cases, affecting the applicability of Section 304 IPC.
Eyewitness testimonies can substantiate convictions even amidst substantial trial delays, with the court having the discretion to modify sentences based on the age and circumstances of the accused.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.