Back
ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Monimala Dey – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. timeline of events leading to appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 2. nature of allegations and initial incident analysis. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments supporting the appeal. (Para 7) |
| 4. decisions on the appeals and statutory interpretations. (Para 9) |
| 5. critique of trial court's decision. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. investigative shortcomings and witness statements. (Para 14 , 15 , 18 , 20) |
| 7. legal provisions governing public justice. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 8. judgment rationale and conclusion. (Para 28 , 30 , 32) |
| 9. final orders and implications. (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.
1. This appeal is preferred against the impugned order no. 30 dated 30.05.2012 passed by the Learned Sessions Judge, Paschim Medinipur in Sessions Trial Case No. IV-Nov/2010 through which the Learned Sessions Judge made a complaint under Section 340 Cr.P.C., before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Paschim Medinipur for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 182 and Section 181 read with Section 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE against the PW-1 Monimala Day, PW-2 Shyamal Das and PW-5 Satya Prasad Dey.
2. Criminal appeal No. 392 of 2012 arose out of an application under Section 341 of the Cod
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
