RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Jitendra Chandrakar S/o Shri Malikram Chandrakar – Appellant
Versus
Namita Chandrakar W/o Shri Jitendra Chandrakar – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners have questioned the legality and validity of the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur in Complaint Case No. 2670/2015 dated 30.11.2015, whereby cognizance has been taken of a complaint filed by the respondent against the petitioners for commission of offence punishable under Sections 191, 192, 193, 196, 120-B read with Section 34 of IPC.
2. It is undisputed that the petitioner No. 1 is the husband of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 23.05.2010.
3. The facts of the present case in a nutshell are that barely after two months of marriage, on account of a certain dispute, the respondent left her matrimonial house and thereafter, the petitioner No. 1 made a complaint making imputation on the character of the respondent to the President of his community on 08.10.2010 and on 16.06.2011, he filed a petition for dissolution of marriage, whereas the respondent filed Misc. Judicial Case No. 8/2012 under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for grant of maintenance before the Family Court, Raipur. In a proceeding under MJC No. 8/2012, the respondent examined herself as witness No. 1, whereas petitioner No. 1 examined himself along wit
Ashok Kumar Aggarwal vs. Union of India and Others
Dhariwal Tobacco Products Limited and Others vs. State of Maharashtra and Another
Iqbal Singh Marwah vs. Meenakshi Marwah
K. Karunakaran vs. T.V. Eachara Warrier
K.T.M.S. Mohd. and Another vs. Union of India
M.S. Ahlawat vs. State of Haryana and Another
Pepsi Foods Ltd. and Another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.