ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
Arindam Taraphdar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, J.
1. The instant revisional application has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the proceedings of Case No. C.R. 230 of 2008 pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jangipur, Murshidabad under Sections 37(1)(vii), 9, 38, 39(1), 39(2), 61 and 62 read with Section 60 of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985.
2. The Inspector of Legal Metrology, Jangipur Unit No. 46, District-Murshidabad, instituted a complaint in the Court of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jangipur, Murshidabad, being authorized to file the same by the Controller of Legal Metrology, West Bengal under Section 63 of the Standard of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’) against the present petitioners no. 1, 2 and 3 who are described as follows:The petitioner no. 1, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited is a Government Company under the Companies Act, 1956 and also a Government of India Enterprise functioning under the administrative control of Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India dealing with the business of refining, distributing and marketing
GHCL Employees Stock Option Trust v. India Infoline Ltd. (2013) 4 SCC 505 : (2013) 2 SCC (Cri) 414
Gunmala Sales (P) Ltd. v. Anu Mehta
Rallis India Ltd. v. Poduru Vidya Bhushan
S.K. Alagh v. State of U.P. (2008) 5 SCC 662 : (2008) 2 SCC (Cri) 686
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for specific averments and unimpeachable evidence to establish vicarious liability of directors in cases of cheque bounce under Sec....
(1) Dishonour of cheque – Offence by company – For fastening criminal liability, there is no legal requirement for complainant to show that accused partner of firm was aware about each and every tran....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of arraigning the company as an accused for maintaining the prosecution under Section 141 of the NI Act, and the requirement of speci....
Directors can only be held vicariously liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act if specific averments are made in the complaint regarding their responsibility for the company's cond....
Specific averments are necessary to establish the liability of a Director under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act; mere designation is insufficient.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.