IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
KRISHNA RAO, J.
J.K. Yarn Private Limited - Plaintiff
Versus
Thiruvalluvaar Textiles Private Limited - Defendant
CS (COM) No. 527 of 2024 (Old No. CS 144 of 2023) With IA No. GA (COM) 2 of 2024
Decided On : 26-07-2024
Commercial - Plaintiff's Claim - Order VIII Rule 10, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court interpreted the provisions allowing for a decree in absence of defense, emphasizing the defendant's admissions and the commercial nature of the suit, leading to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff sued the defendant for a sum of Rs.1,65,90,037.41/- plus interest, based on an oral agreement and subsequent lease agreement, asserting that the defendant owed them money for yarn supplied and a refundable advance.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the defendant had admitted the debt through various communications and failed to contest the suit, leading to the conclusion that the plaintiff was entitled to the claimed amount along with interest.
Issues: Whether the defendant is liable to pay the claimed amount and interest, given their admissions and failure to appear in court.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied Order VIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowing for a decree based on the defendant's admissions and lack of defense, reinforcing the need for expedient resolution in commercial disputes.
Result: The defendant is ordered to pay Rs.1,44,26,119.49/- with interest at 12% per annum and costs of Rs.1,00,000/- to the plaintiff.
JUDGMENT :
Krishna Rao, J.
1. The plaintiff herein had instituted the captioned suit against the defendant, for a decree of a sum of Rs.1,65,90,037.41/- along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum on and from 1st July, 2023 till date of realisation and allied prayers.
2. The plaintiff has filed the present application under Chapter XIIIA of the Original Side Rules of this Court, praying for final judgment and decree for a sum of Rs.1,65,90,037.41/- along with interest.
3. The plaintiff is a company incorporated on or about 23rd January, 2008, under the Companies Act, 1956, and is engaged in the business of trading of yarn.
4. In the month of March, 2008, the Directors of the defendant approached the plaintiff to start a business relationship with the plaintiff. After series of meetings and discussion, the parties thereto entered into an oral agreement on the following terms and conditions :
(ii) The plaintiff shall make payments including advance payments, as and when required to the defendant from its bank accounts maintained with Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited, Netaji Subhas Road Branch, Kolkata and HDFC Bank Limited, Tollygaunge Branch, Kolkata, for the defendant to take steps for causing delivery of the desired quantity and quality of yarn to the plaintiff;
(iii) The advance so received by the defendant shall be exclusively utilised by the defendant for the purpose of effecting supply upon the plaintiff;
(iv) In the event, if the goods supplied by the defendant do not conform with the specifications as desired by the plaintiff, the defendant shall forthwith replace the said goods with the goods of the desired specification at its own cost and expenses;
(v) The orders shall be placed by the plaintiff from its office and the goods would be supplied by the defendant from its factory;
(vi) The account between the parties would be mutual, current, and open as the advances or part payments made by the plaintiff to the defendant shall not be on invoice-wise basis but shall be generally made from time to time.
5. Thereafter, the parties started transacting business between them, and in or around August, 2018, upon reconciliation of accounts, it became apparent that the defendant owed the plaintiff a total amount of Rs.1,46,94,527.66/- and thus the parties mutually agreed to allocate the aforesaid due sum in manner mentioned herein below :
(ii) The remaining balance of Rs. 46,94,527.66/- was identified as the opening balance in a separate account titled “J.K. Yarn Private Limited, Rasipuram”.
6. As agreed between the parties, a sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/- was adjusted by the defendant toward refundable advance payable by the plaintiff, under a ‘Lease Agreement’ executed on 16th July, 2018, as per the terms of which, the plaintiff would have the right to utilize the entire factory premises that encompassed two mills, namely Mill “A” and “B” and pursuant thereto the plaintiff had deposited a sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/- as a refundable advance with the defendant.
7. The terms and conditions of the said ‘Lease Agreement’ dated 16th July, 2018, are mentioned herein below :
Shri Ajodhya Pd. Bhargava Vs. Shri Bhawani Shankar Bhargava and Another
Admissions made by a party can serve as substantive evidence, allowing the court to grant a decree in the absence of a defense.
The court emphasized that disputed documents and agreements raised triable issues that required evidence and could not be decided summarily.
Judgment on admission can be granted when there is a clear, unequivocal acknowledgment of debt, allowing the court to bypass a full trial.
A party seeking judgment on admission must demonstrate clear and unequivocal admissions, and failure to establish a prima facie case precludes injunction relief.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that admissions by the parties and the authenticity of documents play a crucial role in determining liability for loan repayment.
In a suit based on invoices, the invoices must be treated as a written contract. If the Defendant raises no genuine triable issues or the defense is frivolous, the Plaintiff shall be entitled to judg....
A single isolated instance of lending money does not constitute a money-lending business requiring a license under the Bengal Money Lenders Act, 1940.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of the defendants to fulfill their obligations under the agreement and pay the agreed amount with interest to the plaintiff.
Cheques may constitute mode of payment by plaintiff and they may constitute evidence of transaction of loan, but they cannot said to be basis of money suit.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.