KRISHNA RAO
Dhruv Surana – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Singh Bengani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of loan and repayment terms. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding loan validity and licenses. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. judicial analysis on maintainability and admissions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court's reasoning on trailable issues. (Para 22 , 24) |
| 5. final order and decree issued. (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT :
(Krishna Rao, J.)
1. The plaintiff has filed the present application praying for final judgment upon admission for a sum of Rs. 49,45,548/-. The plaintiff has filed the suit being CS No. 12 of 2021 praying for following reliefs:
(b) Interim interest and interest upon judgment at the rate of 15 % per annum.”
2. The plaintiff in his plaint contended that the defendant having long time acquaintance with the plaintiff and sometimes in the last week of October, 2016, the defendant approached the plaintiff for one time financial accommodation of Rs. 35,00,000/- for his business purpose. Pursuant to the discussion between the plaintiff and the defendant, the plaintiff agreed to pay Rs. 35 lakhs to the defendant, as a short time financial accommodation whi
Astrex Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. –vs- Surendra Singh Bengani
Barnwall Marketing & Ors. –vs-Gee Pee Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
Dr. (Mrs.) Shabbir Fatima & Others –vs- The Chancellor, University of Allahabad & Others.
Himani Alloys Limited –vs-Tata Steel Ltd.
IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited –vs- Hubtown Limited
J.K. Engineering Pvt. Ltd. –vs- ANE Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Jeevan Diesels and Electricals Ltd. –vs- Jasbir Singh Chadha (HUF) & Anr.
Nagubai Ammal & Others –vs- B. Shama Rao & Ors.
Prabha Surana –vs- Jaideep Halwasiya
Sitaram Poddar –vs- Bhagirath Choudhary
United Bank of India -vs- Nederlandsche Standard Bank
Uttam Singh Duggal & Co. Ltd. –vs- United Bank of India & Ors.
A single isolated instance of lending money does not constitute a money-lending business requiring a license under the Bengal Money Lenders Act, 1940.
A court can pass Judgment and Decree on admission based on admissions made by a party, even if the defendant raises a defence, if the defence is insufficient or illusory.
A party seeking judgment on admission must demonstrate clear and unequivocal admissions, and failure to establish a prima facie case precludes injunction relief.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of 'commercial dispute' and 'service' under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and the relevance of the Bengal Money Lenders Ac....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.