IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.
M/s. Harsh Polyfabric Private Limited – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
W.P.O. No. 588 of 2019, W.P.O. No. 235 of 2021
Decided On : 19-06-2024
Classification - Spunbonded Polypropylene Bed Sheets - CGST Act, 2017 Sections 54(3), 56; CGST Rules, 2017 Rule 89 - The court interpreted the classification of goods under the Customs Tariff Act, emphasizing the importance of common parlance and the burden of proof on the revenue authority, leading to the quashing of the denial of refund.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a manufacturer of Spunbonded Polypropylene Bed Sheets, sought a refund of Input Tax Credit denied due to disputed classification under the GST regime, claiming it should be classified under Chapter 6304 instead of 5603.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent authorities failed to prove that the PPSB Bed Sheets were correctly classified under heading 5603, emphasizing the need for the revenue authority to substantiate its claims with evidence.
Issues: Whether the classification of Spunbonded Polypropylene Bed Sheets under the GST regime was correct and whether the denial of Input Tax Credit refund was justified.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the burden of proof lies with the revenue authority to demonstrate the correct classification of goods, and the failure to do so invalidated the denial of the refund.
Result: The court quashed the denial of refund and ordered a reassessment of the classification of the PPSB Bed Sheets.
JUDGMENT :
RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filled in relation to the order passed by the appellate authority wherein Spunbonded Polypropylene Bed Sheets have been classified under the heading 5603 instead of 6304 thereby partially denying the refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit on account of inverted duty structure of Rs. 39,61,030/- for such classification.
2. The facts in a nutshell are that the petitioner is a company duly incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and are inter alia engaged in manufacturing, exporting and supplying of various non-woven fabrics and Spunbonded Polypropylene Bed Sheets (hereinafter referred to as ‘PPSB Bed Sheet’) since 2007. The petitioner classifies such non-woven fabrics and PPSB Bed Sheet under the chapter headings 5603 and 6304 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 respectively.
3. The Petitioner engages in the production of non-woven fabric utilizing Polypropylene Granules (referred to hereinafter as “PP Granules”) through the application of Spun Bond technology. The Spun Bond process, a method employed in non-woven fabrication, involves the transformation of PP Granules into continuous filaments, which are subsequently deposited and fused together to yield non-woven fabric.
4. The aforesaid process of manufacture of polypropylene non-woven fabric and the PPSB Bed Sheet was also verified by the State Tax Officers, Bureau of Investigation, Govt. of West Bengal, during their visit to the petitioner’s factory on 14.02.2019. A copy of the report of the said visit was also prepared under the seal of State Tax Officer, Bureau of Investigation, Govt. of West Bengal.
5. The petitioner supplies the Polypropylene non-woven fabric on payment of GST @ 12% (6% CGST+ 6% SGST) as per SL. No. 135 of Schedule II of Notification No. 01/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
6. With regard to supply of the PPSB Bed Sheet so manufactured, in the pre-GST regime, the Petitioner was a registered dealer under West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Bed Sheets were covered under item Sl. No. 3B of Schedule A to the WBVAT Act. For goods covered under Schedule A to the WBVAT Act, no tax was payable. The PPSB Bed Sheet falling under Chapter 63 were also exempt from whole of the Excise Duty in terms of Notification No. 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004. Accordingly, the Petitioner was supplying such PPSB Bed Sheets without payment of VAT/CST or Excise Duty.
7. After the implementation of GST w.e.f. July 2017, the Petitioner has been classifying the PPSB under the tariff heading 6304 and discharging GST @ 5% (2.5% CGST+ 2.5% SGST) in accordance with S. No. 224 of Schedule I to the Notification No. 01/2017 CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
8. However, the classification of bed sheets manufactured was disputed under the erstwhile VAT regime. In the proceedings before the Hon'ble West Bengal Taxation Tribunal in the case of the Petitioner with Registration Number 1310/2017, the primary argument put forth by the revenue department was the purported distinction between bed sheets and PPSB Bed Sheet. Consequently, it was asserted that bed sheets crafted from polypropylene non-woven fabric would not qualify for the tax exemption stipulated in Serial 3B of Schedule A to the WBVAT Act, 2003. Nevertheless, the Hon’ble Tribunal, in its order dated 30.11.2018, ruled that the PPSB Bed Sheet manufactured and traded by the Petitioner were exclusively utilized as bed sheets and thus were entitled to the exemption from tax payment pursuant to Serial No. 3B of Schedule A to the West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
9. In the present matter, the GST rate applicable to the procurement of PP Granules, as classified under HSN 3901 or 3902, stands at 18%. Conversely, non-woven fabric supplies under HSN code 5603 incur a taxable rate of 12%, while supplies of PPSB Bed Sheet under HSN Code 6304 are taxed at 5%. This incongruous rate structure has led to the accumulation of credit on the pa
Apparel Export Promotion Council v. A.K. Chopra
Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Syed Ahmad Ishaque
Puma Ayurvedic Herbal (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Nagpur
The burden of proof for product classification lies with the taxing authority, and mere assertions without evidence are insufficient to justify classification decisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the product in question is made from plastic granules and cannot be treated as textile articles, as uniformly adopted by the Appellate Authori....
The court established that woven fabrics, regardless of raw material, are classified as textiles under GST, ensuring uniformity in tax treatment across similar products.
The classification of goods under the Customs Tariff Act must align with their actual characteristics, particularly distinguishing between fully and partially coated fabrics.
Tax exemption for HDPE woven fabrics requires actual levy of additional duty; nil rate does not equate to exemption under sales tax law.
The court established that the classification of tobacco products relies on the presence of manufacturing activity; absence of such activity necessitates classification as unmanufactured tobacco unde....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.