IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAI CHATTOPADHYAY, J.
Debabrata Bera & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
WPO 2626 of 2022, IA No. GA 1 of 2023, WPO 2629 of 2022, WPO 2631 of 2022, WPO 2632 of 2022
Decided On : 10-05-2024
Promotion - Writ Petitions - Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 20, 28, 29, 30, 634 - The court found the modification of recruitment regulations by the Board of Administrators arbitrary and beyond its authority, violating the rights of employees to promotion under existing regulations.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitioners, Sub-Assistant Engineers at Kolkata Municipal Corporation, challenged the delay in promotion and a new circular that altered recruitment regulations, claiming it was arbitrary and illegal.
Finding of the Court:
The court concluded that the Board of Administrators exceeded its authority by modifying recruitment regulations, which adversely affected the petitioners' rights to promotion.
Issues: Whether the Board of Administrators had the authority to modify recruitment regulations and if the new circular was arbitrary and illegal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Board of Administrators could not alter existing recruitment policies, as such changes require legislative authority, which it lacked.
Result: The court set aside the impugned circular and directed the initiation of the promotion process under the previous regulations.
JUDGMENT :
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.) :
1. Four writ petitions being (i) WPO No. 2626 of 2022 with GA 1 of 2023 (ii) WPO No. 2629 of 2022, (iii) WPO No. 2631 of 2022, (iv) WPO No. 2632 of 2022 with GA 1 of 2023, have been heard together. Those are being disposed of by dint of a common judgment, as follows.
2. The writ petitioners are working for gain with respondent no. 3, that is, Kolkata Municipal Corporation. The writ petitioners are posted as Sub- Assistant Engineers. Until now their services have been controlled and guided by the Recruitment Regulations of the respondent Corporation, being a Circular dated August 10, 2020. Their promotional post is that of an Assistant Engineer. The promotional policy as was prevalent so far is as follows:-
15% of the post of total cadre strength of Assistant Engineer (Civil/Mechanical/Electrical) shall be filled up by promotion from amongst the Sub Assistant Engineers (Civil/Mechanical/Electrical) having an Engineering Degree or equivalent from a recognized University; and having at least 10 years’ experience as Sub Assistant Engineer (Civil/Mechanical/Electrical) out of which a minimum of 5 years should be a degree (or equivalent) holder Sub Assistant Engineer (Civil/Mechanical/Electrical) in respective streams.
35% of the total cadre strength shall be filled up by direct recruitment observing necessary formalities.”
3. The writ petitioners have put forth their grievance that, in spite of vacancy having arisen, the process of promotion has not been initiated by the respondent No. 3/Corporation in due time, upon the vacancy being created. They say that in other areas and for other posts the authorities have duly conducted the process of promotion, so that the posts may be filled in time, but not in case of the writ petitioners. Such inaction on part of the respondent Corporation has been turned out to be a motivated one, for the reason as stated herein below. The writ petitioners say that to be an arbitrary as well as an illegal act, on the part of the respondent/Corporation, liable to be set aside.
4. In 2020, in the wake of pandemic due to spread of COVID-19 Virus, a general lockdown was experienced by the country, not to speak of the State and the respondent Corporation. This has prompted a notification to be published by the Government of West Bengal dated May 6, 2020. By dint of the same the “Board of Administrators” was appointed, for functioning of the respondent no. 3/Corporation, for the reason of inability to hold election of “Mayor-in-Council”, upon expiry of the statutory life of the previous “Mayor-in-Council”, due to pandemic and lockdown.
5. The “Board of Administrators” has introduced the impugned Circular dated July 22, 2022, by dint of which it had modified and changed the Recruitment Regulations pertaining to the writ petitioners as mentioned above.
6. The method of recruitment vide the said notification dated July 22, 2022, was directed to be
(ii) By promotion from the posts borne in the common cadre of Sub-Assistant Engineer (Civil/Mechanical/Electrical); -the remaining 40% posts of total cadre strength of Assistant Engineer in Civil/Mechanical/Electrical wing shall be filled up by way of promoting from amongst the Sub-Assistant Engineer in respective stream by selection through the West Bengal Municipal Service Commission, subject to fulfilment of the conditions stipulated therein.
7. Such change o
State of Rajasthan vs. R. Dayal & Ors. reported in (1997) 10 SCC 419
Kajal Dutta Roy & Ors. vs. Anil Kumar Joshi & Ors. reported in (2017) 3 CHN 479
H.L Trehan & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Regulations regarding the dismissal and removal of municipal executive officers were found ultra vires, as they exceeded the authority defined in the Municipalities Act, particularly around dismissal....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the validity of the appointment of a Board of Administrators for a Co-operative Society under the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006.
Promotions to Assistant Director, Tea Development were valid under the applicable rules at the time, and their cancellation was unsustainable and violated principles of natural justice.
The Administrator can be appointed under Section 315 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act when elections are not held before the end of the Municipal Council's five-year term, without violating Articl....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that statutory rules prevail over executive instructions, and an executive instruction cannot substantially alter the recruitment procedure establi....
The court emphasized that employment practices must provide equal opportunity and cannot unjustly disrupt established employment after a substantial period.
The discretion to grant extension of the term of office for members of the APMC under Section 14(3) of the Act, 1963 should be exercised judiciously and reasonably, and the right to hold office is no....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.