IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J., HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.
Suresh Kumar Sahoo - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
WPA(P) No. 196 of 2024
Decided On : 20-06-2024
Mental Health - Public Interest Litigation - Mental Health Care Act, 2017 - Sections 94, 115 - The court emphasized the need for effective implementation of suicide prevention measures and mental health care as mandated by the Act, highlighting the government's duties and the importance of mental well-being.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation regarding the ineffective implementation of the Mental Health Care Act, 2017, particularly Sections 94 and 115, aimed at preventing suicide and providing mental health care in West Bengal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that while the government had taken some steps to address mental health issues, further action was necessary to fully implement the provisions of the Mental Health Care Act, 2017, particularly in suicide prevention.
Issues: Whether the government has effectively implemented the provisions of the Mental Health Care Act, 2017, particularly regarding suicide prevention and mental health care.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the government has a duty to implement the provisions of the Mental Health Care Act, 2017, and the National Suicide Prevention Strategy to ensure mental well-being and prevent suicides.
Result: The writ petition is disposed of with directions for the government to consider the petitioner's representation and take appropriate action within six months.
JUDGMENT :
1. We have heard learned counsel for the respective parties at length.
2. The petitioner, Mr. Suresh Kumar Sahoo is a practicing advocate before this Court and he is in no way connected with any political party or political activity, a peace loving citizen of India and devoted to social work as his avocation.
3. By this writ petition, filed as a Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner has flagged a very important issue qua the implementation of the provisions of Mental Health Care Act, 2017 (for short, the Act). According to the petitioner, the said Act has come into force for the purpose of preservation of mental well-being and wholesomeness of every human being and in the Act, there are specific provisions under Sections 94 and 115 for prevention of suicide and cure of anxiety, stress, depression causing suicide. It is further stated that during 2020, the Government of India adopted National Suicide Prevention Strategy and the grievance of the petitioner is that till date there is no effective implementation of the said provision of prevention of suicide in rehabilitation centres in the State of West Bengal. The petitioner laments that there is an increasing rate of suicide, particularly, among the young generation aged about 20 and 30 specifically related to matrimonial, academic and career related issues. In this background, the petitioner seeks for implementation of Sections 94 and 115.
4. The Mental Health Care Act, 2017 was enacted to mental health care and services for persons with mental illness and to protect, promote and fulfill the rights of such persons during delivery of mental health care and services and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
5. The petitioner seeks for implementation of Sections 94 and 115. Section 94 deals with emergency treatment. Sub-section 1 of Section 94 starts with a non-obstante clause stating that notwithstanding anything contained in the Act any medical treatment including treatment for mental illness may be provided by a registered medical practitioner to a person with mental illness either at a Health Establishment or in the Community, subject to the informed concerned consent of the nominated representative, where the nominated representative is available and where it is immediately necessary to prevent (a) death or irreversible harm to the health of the person or (b) person inflicting serious harm to himself or other or (c) the person causing serious damage to property belong to himself or other where such behaviour is believed to flow directly from the person’s mental illness.
6. There are other safeguards which have been provided under Sections 2 to 4 while implementing the procedure under Section 94 of the said Act. Section 115 has two sub-sections. Sub-section 1 starts with non-obstante clause stating that notwithstanding anything contained in Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code any person who attempts to commit suicide shall be presumed unless proved otherwise, to have severe stress and shall not be tried and punished under the same Code. Sub-section 2 of Section 115 states that the appropriate Government shall have a duty to provide care, treatment and rehabilitation to a person having severe stress and who attempted to commit suicide, to reduce the risk of recurrence of attempt to commit suicide.
7. The petitioner before approaching this Court by way of this writ petition has submitted to the authorities of the Central Government as well as the State Government by a representation dated 19.02.2024. The petitioner has emphasized that Section 115 imposes a duty on appropriate Government to provide care, treatment and rehabilitation to a person having severe stress who attempted to have committed suicide in order to reduce the risk of recurrence of attempting to commit suicide.
8. Therefore, it is submitted that the unique feature of this Section 115 is how to prevent suicide and save human life before it is destroyed, which was not found in other earli
The court established that the Mental Health Care Act, 2017 mandates the government to provide mental health care and prevent suicides, emphasizing the importance of effective implementation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the concerned authorities' measures towards the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 in educational institutions were deemed suff....
The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 can be applied retrospectively, providing protections for individuals attempting suicide under severe stress, thus overriding previous criminal liabilities.
The Mental Healthcare Act presumes severe stress in suicide attempts, barring prosecution under IPC unless proven otherwise.
Attempt to commit suicide – Person who tried to commit suicide, enjoys statutory presumption about mental stress and having regard to such presumption, he has been excluded from putting on trial.
The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, creates a presumption of severe stress for suicide attempts, exempting individuals from prosecution under IPC Section 309.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.