SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4794

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Satish Chandra Sharma, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
Ms. Devina Singh(minor) (through Her Father) – Appellant
Versus
The Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7439 of 2021 and CM APPL. 18969 of 2023
Decided On : 03-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Sonia Mathur, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ronika Tater, Ms. Pratiksha Mishra, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Ms. Rupakshi Soni, Mr. Nikhil Chandra Jaiswal and Mr. Simarjeet Singh Saluja, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing Counsel with Mr. Yash Singh and Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocates with Mr. Amit Khanna, Associate Professor, for the Respondent/IBHAS.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the concerned authorities' measures towards the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 in educational institutions were deemed sufficient by the court, leading to the disposal of the Writ Petition.

Headnote:

Mental Healthcare Act - Implementation in Educational Institutions - Chapter X (Sections 65-72) - Summary: The court addressed the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 in educational institutions, specifically at the school and collegiate level. The key legal provisions discussed include the provisions of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, Chapter X (Sections 65-72), and Section 2(p) of the Act. The court considered the measures taken by the concerned authorities towards the implementation of the Act and concluded that no further orders are required to be passed.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a minor, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions for the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 in educational institutions. The petitioner highlighted the increasing number of adverse cases of mental health diseases amongst the younger populations and the lack of requisite institutional infrastructure to tackle rising instances of mental health-related cases prevalent in students of the school and college-going demographic in the NCT of Delhi.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the concerned authorities had taken measures towards the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, including the existence of multi-speciality hospitals, de-addiction facilities, registered private mental health establishments, District Mental Health Program Clinics, and Substance Use Disorder treatment and rehabilitation centers. The court concluded that no further orders are required to be passed.

Issues: The issues revolved around the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 in educational institutions, the availability of mental health infrastructure, and the measures taken by the authorities to address mental health issues among school and college-going students.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the information provided in the Status Report and the measures taken by the concerned authorities towards the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.

Final Decision: The Writ Petition was disposed of, along with the pending applications, as the court found that no further orders were required to be passed.

JUDGMENT

1. The present Public Interest Litigation has been filed by one Ms. Devina Singh, a minor, through her father, resident of New Delhi, praying for directions to the Respondent authorities herein, for implementation of provisions of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 and its accompanying rules in educational institutions, specifically at the school and collegiate level. The Petitioner has sought for the following directions:

    "A. Direct the Respondents to implement the Mental Healthcare Act 2017 at schools and colleges for the benefit of the students.

    B. Direct the Respondents to constitute the mental health establishment (including clinic/centre) as per the Chapter X (Sections 65-72) read with Section 2(p) of the Act in each district, schools, and colleges of the district.

    C. Direct the Respondents to mandate the presence of clinical psychiatrists, counsellors, social workers and mental health professionals in each school and college of the district.

    D. Direct the Respondents to make diagnosis and assessment of mental health mandatory in each school and college.

    E. Direct the Respondents to implement the National Mental Health programme as formulated along with awareness and promotion of mental health of students in each school and college.

    F. Direct the Respondents to conduct mental health survey for data collection at schools and colleges for the mental health assessment of students on regular basis/periodic intervals.

    G. Issue such other writ, direction, or order, which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case"

2. Respondent No. 1 is the GNCTD and Respondent No. 2 is the Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences (IHBAS), an autonomous body tasked with looking after mental health issues in Delhi.

3. Being concerned with rise of mental health issues in school and college going students, the Petitioner has filed the instant petition. It is submitted by the Petitioner that due to growing incidents of mental illness amongst school and college going students, the Government of India introduced Mental Healthcare Bill, 2013 in order to curb the number of rising cases of mental illnesses such as stress, anxiety, fear, panic, depression, insomnia, isolation, disconnectedness, loneliness, trauma, lack of self-confidence, positivity and resilience etc. It is submitted that to ensure healthcare, treatment and rehabilitation of persons with mental illness as well as to protect and promote the rights of persons with mental illness during the delivery of healthcare, the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 was enacted to protect and promote the rights of persons with mental illness and to ensure that healthcare, treatment and rehabilitation services be provided to persons with mental illness at mental health institutions.

4. The Petitioner states that the information relied upon by them in the instant petition are directly derived from publicly available documents, government surveys and from correspondences with public authorities under the RTI Act. Some of these documents include National Mental Health Survey of India 2015-16, the Mental Healthcare Bill 2013, government surveys and reports by international organizations including the likes of WHO, to highlight the increasing number of adverse cases of mental health diseases amongst the younger populations. The Petitioner, placing reliance on various documents and survey reports (Mental Healthcare Survey), has highlighted the myriad of issues pertaining to mental health and the lack of requisite institutional infrastructure to tackle with rising instances of mental health related cases prevalent in students of the school and college going demographic in the NCT of Delhi. The Petitioner, therefore, prays for effective implementation of provisions of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 that are purposed to provide adequate mental healthcare infrastructure and services for persons with mental illness and for matters connected with or incidental theret

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top