HARISH TANDON, MADHURESH PRASAD
Susmita Pal – Appellant
Versus
Dipak Pal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Harish Tandon, J.)
The application for dissolution of marriage under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act alleging cruelty and/or desertion at the instance of the wife/appellant is rejected by the Court below on the finding that the wife/appellant has miserably failed to prove the act of cruelty perpetrated upon her by the husband/respondent nor could prove the act of desertion without any reasonable cause.
2. The wife/appellant has assailed the said judgment and decree and the learned advocate appearing for the wife/appellant has restricted the argument solely on the ground of cruelty and irretrievable breakdown of marriage.
3. At the very outset, we record that the pleading of the wife/appellant is scanty and does not vividly include the incidents of cruelty except by generalising the cruelty in physical and mental form. The parties to the proceeding are married according to Hindu rituals and rites on 04.06.2002. Since after the marriage they started residing together as husband and wife and the marriage was duly consummated which would be evident from the fact that the girl was born of the said wedlock. It is pleaded in the application by the wife that the husband/resp
G.V.N. Kameswara Rao vs. G. Jabilli reported in AIR 2002 SC 576
Savitri Pandey vs. Prem Chandra Pandey) reported in AIR 2002 SC 591
The court held that allegations of cruelty and desertion require clear evidence, which the wife/appellant failed to provide, leading to the dismissal of her application for divorce.
The judgment emphasizes the need to consider the cultural, ethical, and social aspects of the parties' lives in determining cruelty in matrimonial disputes, as well as the importance of ascertaining ....
Divorce – Act of cruelty which can be reasonably perceived in one case may not be a cruelty in another case because of disparity in environment in which parties have grown up.
Cruelty in matrimonial law encompasses both physical and mental aspects, with the latter requiring a cumulative assessment of conduct that causes reasonable apprehension of harm to the aggrieved spou....
Point of Law : Divorce - where there has been a long period of continuous separation, it may fairly be concluded that the matrimonial bond is beyond repair.
Cruelty and desertion must be proven with specific evidence; irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a statutory ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Mental cruelty can be established through sustained defamation and allegations affecting dignity, supporting grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Cruelty and abandonment constitute valid grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, where neglect and long separation are treated as factors leading to irreversible breakdown of the marriage.
Point of Law : Matrimonial Dispute - Cruelty - None of instances of cruelty, pleaded in plaint, would amount to commission of cruelty within meaning of Section 13 of Act, 1955 nor does it satisfy the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.