SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 1522

PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Sk. Shajamal – Appellant
Versus
Ashim Mondal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sarajit Sen And Mr. Tapas Singha Roy.
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Partha Pratim Roy And Mr. Dyutiman Banerjee.

JUDGMENT :

Partha Sarathi Sen, J.

Both parties are represented by their respective learned Advocates.

2. Heard Mr. Sarajit Sen, learned Advocate for the petitioners at length. Also heard Mr. Dyutiman Banerjee, learned Advocate led by Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, learned Advocate for the opposite parties.

3. The affidavit-in-opposition and the affidavit-in-reply as filed today be taken on record.

4. The present revisional application is now taken up for passing appropriate order.

5. In this revisional application as filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the Order No. 141 dated January 5, 2022 as passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 2nd Court, Baruipur, District - South 24 Parganas in Title Suit No. 47 of 2011 has been assailed.

6. By the impugned order learned Trial Court allowed the opposite party Nos. 10 and 11's application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure and, thus, directed that the present opposite party Nos. 10 and 11 be added as defendant Nos. 10 and 11 in Title Suit No. 47 of 2011 as pending before the learned Trial Court.

7. In support of the instant revisional application learned Advocate for the plaintiffs/revisionists at the very outset

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top