Pushpa Madan vs Jagadish Caterar Pvt. Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Cal) 1517

AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Pushpa Madan – Appellant
Versus
Jagadish Caterar Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee, Mr. Souvik Das, Mr. K.R. Ahmed, Mr. Rudranil Das
For the Respondent: Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee, Mr. Sib Sankar Das

Table of Content
1. details of the appellant's case and previous court order. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding the delay in rent deposit and reliance on legal advice. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's observations on legal compliance in eviction cases. (Para 4 , 5)
4. legal standards for mandatory statutory requirements and delay. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
5. final ruling dismissing the case. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT :

Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.

1. Order dated 29th November, 2018 passed by the Learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) 2nd Court, Alipore in Ejectment Suit No. 353 of 2009 (subsequently renumbered as Ejectment Suit No. 6201 of 2014) has been assailed by filing the present application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Plaintiff opposite party herein being land lord filed aforesaid suit for Ejectment of premises tenant against the petitioner herein. The petitioners appeared in the said suit on 06.06.2014 and also filed their written statement. The petitioner further submits that as per the advice of the learned Advocate for the petitioner the petitioners were depositing rent regularly before the Rent Controller at Alipore till January 2016. Thereafter the petitioner changed their p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document