SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 1620

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.
Dinesh Barman – Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. – Opposite Parties
CRR 3 of 2010
Decided On : 19-10-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sabir Ahmed, Sr. Adv., Mr. Biswajit Sarkar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party : Mr. B.K. Ray, Adv. Ms. Sima Biswas, Adv., Mr. Anirban Mitra, Adv.

The prosecution must establish beyond reasonable doubt that a defendant was in unlawful possession of stolen property; failure to do so results in acquittal.

Headnote:(A) Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 - Section 3(a) - Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482 - Impeachment of conviction - Conviction under Section 3(a) for possession of stolen railway property affirmed by appellate court, but lack of evidence to prove possession beyond reasonable doubt led to acquittal. (Para 17)

(B) Burden of proof - It is essential to prove unlawful possession of property; merely apprehension without corroborating evidence is insufficient for conviction. (Para 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was accused of theft of railway property following a police chase on 20th October 2001, resulting in his arrest without conclusive evidence linking him to the stolen items.

Findings of Court:
The court found that there was insufficient evidence to establish unlawful possession, leading to the conclusion that the trial court's conviction was in error.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the prosecution proved unlawful possession of property.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the core elements of the offence, primarily the possession of stolen goods by the accused.

Result: Conviction set aside; petitioner acquitted and released from bail.

Table of Content
1. an application under section 482 crpc reviewing unlawful possession of railway property. (Para 1)
2. unlawful possession requires evidence of theft. (Para 2 , 5 , 6)
3. witness testimonies support prosecution's claim of theft. (Para 3 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11)
4. prosecution must prove possession beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 4 , 16)
5. judgment reflects abuse of process; an order of acquittal. (Para 17)
6. final order for acquittal and compliance directions. (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.

1. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure impeaching the judgement and order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Coochbehar in Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2009 affirming thereby the judgement and order of conviction passed by learned 3rd Court of Judicial Magistrate at Coochbehar in C.R. Case No. 237 of 2001 under Section 3 (a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966, and by the impugned order the petitioner has been sentenced to suffer imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/-with a default clause.

2. Fact of the case in short is that on 19th October, 2001 at about 11.30 P.M. one Rajib Kumar Mishra received an information regarding theft in 5623 Up Cochin Express between New Coochbehar and Pundibari Railway Station, Rajib Kumar Mishra along with S.I. M. Prasad, A.S.I. N.C. Sarkar, Head Constable S.C. Roy and Constable Ali Hussain started track searching. At about one hour on 20th October, 2001, when they reached near K.M. 118/9/7-8 in between Pundibari and New Choochbehar, they noticed 4/5 persons were carrying something on their head on the right side of the railway track. They were proceeding towards Pundibari. The police party chased them and caught one of them at K.M. No. 118/9 while others managed to flee throwing away the articles they were carrying. The police personnel identified two of them as Jhola Mia of New Alipurduar and Abdul Mazid @ Uku Mia. The person apprehended introduced himself as Dinesh Barman and seized gunny bags of tea having mark as PW Bill 601632 P-3 Ex GHY-PDY via HWH/MAS dated 11th October, 2001 along with 9 bundles of resoling tyre materials in white plastic bag having railway mark PW Bill No. 573642 P/19 Ex ERS-GHY (M) 1.87 were recovered. The person could not produce any document to justify his possession and ultimately confessed he along with others committed theft from a luggage van of mail train which was going towards New Coochbehar. He was arrested and brought to R.P.F. Post where a complaint was filed against the accused persons. The properties recovered, was seized by the S.I. Rajib Kumar Mishra under a seizure list. The tea bags were found in wet condition and were sold in a public auction on 1st December, 2001 with the approval of the Hon’ble Court and a sum of Rs. 2640 was appropriated as sale proceeds. Jhola Mia and Abdul Mazid surrendered to the jurisdiction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coochbehar. Police after completion of investigation submitted prosecution report having found prima face case against three accused persons for committing offence under Section 3 (a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

3. Trial was commenced and learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coochbehar in course of trial recorded the testimony of 12 witnesses being examined by the prosecution and recorded order of conviction which was subsequently affirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Coochbehar. To prove the charge under Section 3 (a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 says :-

    “3. Penalty for unlawful possession of railway property.— Whoever is found, or is proved to have been, in possession of any railway property reasonably suspected of having been stolen or unlawful obtained shall, unless he proves that the railway property came into his possession lawfully, be punishable—

    (a) for the first offence, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years, or wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top