IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.
Sri Paritosh Kumar Ghosh & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. - Respondents
CRR 3354 of 2023
Decided on : 09-01-2025
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present revisional application has been preferred praying for quashing of proceedings in Chatterjeehat P.S. Case No. 162/22 dated 25th August, 2022 under Sections 498A/406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 4836 of 2022.
2. The Case of the petitioners is that the petitioner no. 1 is the husband, petitioner no. 2 is the father-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is the mother-in-law of the de facto complainant.
3. The allegations in the written complaint lodged by the de facto complaint herein shows that the de facto complainant was married to the petitioner no. 1 in the year 2020, but in her matrimonial home she was ill-treated and, as such, she was compelled to file a written complaint on 25th August, 2022 when she was staying in her parents’ house from 26th July, 2022 to 25th August, 2022.
4. It is further alleged that at the time of marriage dowry was given along with several articles. It is further stated that though the de facto complainant was told that she would be residing in Suri with her husband, she was never taken to Suri. She also came to know subsequently that her elder sister-in-law who was staying in her matrimonial home was going to be divorced and, as such, the present case was initiated under Sections 498A/406 IPC.
5. From the materials in the case diary shows that during pendency of the present case the ‘streedhan’ articles have been returned to the de facto complainant.
6. Section 498A IPC, lays down:-
Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.
Explanation.— For the purpose of this section, “cruelty” means—
(a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or (b)harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.
Ingredients of offence- The essential ingredients of the offence under sec 498A are as follows:
1) A woman was married;
2) She was subjected to cruelty;
3) Such cruelty consisted in-
i) Any lawful conduct as was likely to drive such woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to her life, limb or health whether mental or physical;
ii) harm to such woman with a view to coercing her to meet unlawful demand for property or valuable security or on account of failure of such woman or any of her relations to meet the lawful demand;
iii) the woman was subjected to such cruelty by
her husband or any relation of her husband.”
7. In Dara Lakshmi Narayana & Ors. vs State of Telangana & Anr., in Criminal Appeal No. ………… of 2024 (arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 16239 of 2024, decided on December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court held:-
Vague allegations in matrimonial disputes cannot sustain criminal prosecution; specificity is required to prevent misuse of legal provisions.
Cruelty and hurt – Allegations of complainant are required to be scrutinized with great care and circumspection.
Vague and generalized allegations in matrimonial disputes cannot sustain criminal prosecution under Section 498A IPC, emphasizing the need for specific details to prevent misuse of legal provisions.
Cruelty and dowry offences – Criminal law must not be permitted to degenerate into instrument of oppression or personal vengeance.
(1) Cruelty – Term “cruelty” cannot be established without specific instances – Mere general allegations of harassment without pointing out specifics against such persons would not be sufficient to c....
Cruelty and dowry offences – A cursory or plausible view cannot be conclusive proof to determine guilt of an individual under Section 498A and Section 4 of D.P. Act, 1961 – Term “cruelty” is subject ....
Vague or generalized allegations in matrimonial disputes do not support criminal proceedings under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, necessitating specific instances for valid charges.
Courts must exercise caution against the misuse of Section 498A IPC by ensuring allegations are supported by prima facie evidence, particularly in matrimonial disputes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.