IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.
Sri Madan Mohan Chandra & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State of West Bengal & Anr. - Respondents
CRR 2448 of 2023
Decided on : 09-01-2025
JUDGMENT :
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J. :
1. The present revisional application has been preferred praying for quashing of the proceeding in G.R. Case No. 1128 of 2021 arising out of Bolpur Police Station Case No. 338 of 2021 dated 13.09.2021 alleging commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/506/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bolpur, Birbhum.
2. Affidavit-of-service showing due service upon the de facto complainant has been filed but the de facto complainant is not represented.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present with the case diary.
4. The petitioner no. 1 is the father-in-law and the petitioner no. 2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased daughter of the de facto complainant.
5. It appears from the written complaint dated 13.09.2021 filed by the de facto complainant with Bolpur Police Station that the de facto complainant’s daughter was married to the son of the petitioners on 10.03.2016. One son was born out of the said wedlock. Since the October, 2019, the daughter of the de facto complainant was residing with her after leaving her matrimonial home, allegedly due to cruelty inflicted by the accused persons.
6. Section 498A IPC, lays down:-
Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.
Explanation.— For the purpose of this section, “cruelty” means—
(a)any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or
(b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.
Ingredients of offence- The essential ingredients of the offence under sec 498A are as follows:
1) A woman was married;
2) She was subjected to cruelty;
3) Such cruelty consisted in-
i) Any lawful conduct as was likely to drive such woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to her life, limb or health whether mental or physical;
ii) harm to such woman with a view to coercing her to meet unlawful demand for property or valuable security or on account of failure of such woman or any of her relations to meet the lawful demand;
iii) the woman was subjected to such cruelty by her husband or any relation of her husband.”
7. In Dara Lakshmi Narayana & Ors. vs State of Telangana & Anr., in Criminal Appeal No. ………… of 2024 (arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 16239 of 2024, decided on December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court held:-
of Section 498A of the IPC to mean any of the acts mentioned in clauses (a) or (b). The first limb of clause (a) of the Explanation of Section 498A of the IPC, states that “cruelty” means any wilful conduct that is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide. The second limb of clause (a) of the Explanation of Section 498A of the IPC, states that cruelty means any wilful conduct that is of such a nature as to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Further, clause (b) of the Explanation of Section 498A of the IPC states that cruelty would also include harassment of the woman where such harassment is to coerce her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by
Vague and generalized allegations in matrimonial disputes cannot sustain criminal prosecution under Section 498A IPC, emphasizing the need for specific details to prevent misuse of legal provisions.
Cruelty and hurt – Allegations of complainant are required to be scrutinized with great care and circumspection.
Vague allegations in matrimonial disputes cannot sustain criminal prosecution; specificity is required to prevent misuse of legal provisions.
The judgment emphasizes the need for specific allegations in cases involving Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and cautions against false implications by way of general omnibus allegations.
The court emphasized the necessity of specific allegations in Section 498A IPC cases to prevent misuse and quashed proceedings lacking prima facie evidence.
The judgment established the importance of specific allegations and cautioned against implicating relatives of the husband without prima facie evidence in cases under Section 498A of the Indian Penal....
The court established that specific allegations are necessary to sustain a charge under Section 498A IPC, preventing misuse of the provision in matrimonial disputes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.