IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Rai Chattopadhyay, J.
Ashoka Sadhukhan – Petitioner
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
WPA 38095 of 2013
Decided On : 20-01-2025
JUDGMENT :
Rai Chattopadhyay, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present case to challenge the order dated November 27, 2012 passed by the Additional District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas.
2. The subject matter of the writ petition relates to grant of higher scale of pay to the petitioner. The petitioner has stated that she was recommended by the West Bengal Regional School Service Commission, South Eastern Region, Barasat, for being appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Dumdum Girls’ High School (H.S.). By dint of its letter dated April 20, 2005 the petitioner was recommended to be appointed as a pass graduate teacher. The petitioner joined in the said school on April 29, 2005. Her approval was granted vide order dated September 7, 2005 as a pass graduate teacher in Science and Mathematics Group. Since thereafter during serving in the said school, the petitioner has decided to upgrade her qualification and similar prayer was submitted by her before Secretary of the School, vide letter dated August 31, 2006. The school authority has granted permission to the petitioner in terms of her prayer, by dint of the resolution dated September 14, 2006.
3. The petitioner in the meantime appeared for the 9th Regional Level Selection Test, 2008, conducted by the School Service Commission and was recommended for being appointed in Bankra High School. This time, writ petitioner was recommended by the School Service Commission as a Chemistry Honours graduate candidate and appointed and approved (on January 14, 2010) as B.Sc. (Hons.) in Chemistry Assistant Teacher.
4. By dint of a letter dated April 19, 2010, address to the Secretary, Bankra High School that after joining in the said school on October 24, 2009, she has appeared for the final examination of M.Sc. Correspondence Course in Vidyasagar University on December 30, 2009. By dint of her said letter she has requested the school authority to release her salary meant for post graduate teachers. The petitioner’s prayer as above was approved by the School Managing Committee. The recommendation of the School Managing Committee for grant of higher pay scale to the writ petitioner was forwarded duly to the office of District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas, vide letter dated June 25, 2010.
5. The resultant order is that impugned in the instant writ petition, which is, dated November 27, 2012. The said letter relates to the subject matter sanction of post graduate scale of pay in favour of Ashoka Sadhukhan, Assistant Teacher, B.Sc. (Hons.) in Chemistry. The Additional District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas has stated in the said letter that the petitioner who is a B.Sc. (Hons.) Assistant Teacher of the school would not be entitled to get higher scale of pay, in terms of G.O. No. 1595-SE (S) dated December 26, 2005 and G.O. No. 593-SE (B) dated November 27, 2007.
6. Mr. Jana, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, categorically relied on the Full Bench Judgment of this Court in Utpal Kanti Karan vs. State of West Bengal & Ors., reported in 2024 SCC Online Cal 1274, to submit that the Court has dealt the similar issue in the case as above, in the following words:-
A teacher's entitlement to a higher pay scale cannot be denied due to procedural lapses by the authority, provided the teacher has complied with necessary requirements.
The court established that inaction by educational authorities cannot deny a teacher's right to a higher pay scale when all procedural requirements have been met.
Encouraging teachers to pursue higher studies and the benefit of higher qualification in providing quality education to students.
Teachers are eligible for higher pay scales upon improving qualifications if prior permission is sought, as clarified by subsequent government notifications.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the requirement for prior permission for enhanced qualification, as per the Government Order dated 27.11.2007, may not be applicable if the ca....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.