SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 104

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Rai Chattopadhyay, J.
Ashoka Sadhukhan – Petitioner
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
WPA 38095 of 2013
Decided On : 20-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shakti Pada Jana.
For the Respondent: Mr. Pantu Deb Roy, Ld. A.G.P. Mr. Subrata Guha Biswas.

A teacher's entitlement to a higher pay scale cannot be denied due to procedural lapses by the authority, provided the teacher has complied with necessary requirements.

Headnote:(A) West Bengal Schools (Control of Expenditure) Act, 2005 - Section 14(3) - Government Orders No. 1595-SE (S) dated December 26, 2005 and No. 593-SE

(B) dated November 27, 2007 - Higher scale of pay - Petitioner, an Assistant Teacher, sought higher pay scale after obtaining a Master's degree, which was denied due to lack of prior permission from the District Inspector of Schools - Court held that prior permission was granted by the school authority, thus the petitioner is entitled to the higher pay scale. (Paras 15, 17, 18)

(B) Education Law - Teacher's entitlement to higher pay scale - The court emphasized that a teacher's substantive right to a higher pay scale cannot be denied based on procedural lapses by the authority. (Paras 15, 17)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher and later pursued a Master's degree. Her request for a higher pay scale was denied on the grounds of not obtaining prior permission from the District Inspector of Schools, despite having received approval from her school.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner had complied with the necessary procedures and was entitled to the higher pay scale from the date following her last examination.

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioner required prior permission from the District Inspector of Schools and the validity of the denial of her pay scale increase.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioner had fulfilled her obligations regarding permission and that the denial of her pay scale was not in accordance with the law.

Result: The impugned order was set aside, and the petitioner was directed to be granted the higher pay scale.

JUDGMENT :

Rai Chattopadhyay, J.

1. The petitioner has filed the present case to challenge the order dated November 27, 2012 passed by the Additional District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas.

2. The subject matter of the writ petition relates to grant of higher scale of pay to the petitioner. The petitioner has stated that she was recommended by the West Bengal Regional School Service Commission, South Eastern Region, Barasat, for being appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Dumdum Girls’ High School (H.S.). By dint of its letter dated April 20, 2005 the petitioner was recommended to be appointed as a pass graduate teacher. The petitioner joined in the said school on April 29, 2005. Her approval was granted vide order dated September 7, 2005 as a pass graduate teacher in Science and Mathematics Group. Since thereafter during serving in the said school, the petitioner has decided to upgrade her qualification and similar prayer was submitted by her before Secretary of the School, vide letter dated August 31, 2006. The school authority has granted permission to the petitioner in terms of her prayer, by dint of the resolution dated September 14, 2006.

3. The petitioner in the meantime appeared for the 9th Regional Level Selection Test, 2008, conducted by the School Service Commission and was recommended for being appointed in Bankra High School. This time, writ petitioner was recommended by the School Service Commission as a Chemistry Honours graduate candidate and appointed and approved (on January 14, 2010) as B.Sc. (Hons.) in Chemistry Assistant Teacher.

4. By dint of a letter dated April 19, 2010, address to the Secretary, Bankra High School that after joining in the said school on October 24, 2009, she has appeared for the final examination of M.Sc. Correspondence Course in Vidyasagar University on December 30, 2009. By dint of her said letter she has requested the school authority to release her salary meant for post graduate teachers. The petitioner’s prayer as above was approved by the School Managing Committee. The recommendation of the School Managing Committee for grant of higher pay scale to the writ petitioner was forwarded duly to the office of District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas, vide letter dated June 25, 2010.

5. The resultant order is that impugned in the instant writ petition, which is, dated November 27, 2012. The said letter relates to the subject matter sanction of post graduate scale of pay in favour of Ashoka Sadhukhan, Assistant Teacher, B.Sc. (Hons.) in Chemistry. The Additional District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas has stated in the said letter that the petitioner who is a B.Sc. (Hons.) Assistant Teacher of the school would not be entitled to get higher scale of pay, in terms of G.O. No. 1595-SE (S) dated December 26, 2005 and G.O. No. 593-SE (B) dated November 27, 2007.

6. Mr. Jana, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, categorically relied on the Full Bench Judgment of this Court in Utpal Kanti Karan vs. State of West Bengal & Ors., reported in 2024 SCC Online Cal 1274, to submit that the Court has dealt the similar issue in the case as above, in the following words:-

    “In case of any conflict between the government order dated 26th December, 2005 and order dated 27th November, 2007 it is needless to mention that the order dated 26th December, 2005 shall prevail. In fact, the government order of 26th December, 2005 was issued in exercise of power under Section 14(3) of the 2005 Act. Although, it has been argued that for the purpose of making rules the assent of the Governor is not required and inadvertently it has been mentioned that “The Governor is pleased hereby to specify” in the earlier Government order all the applications pending prior to 27th November, 2007 are required to be decided on the basis of the Rules existing during the interregnum period and any benefit accrued c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top