Back
DEBANGSU BASAK, MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Binaguri Tea Company Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Nabadignata Industrial Township Authority – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEBANGSU BASAK, J.
1. Appeal is at the behest of the writ petitioner and directed against an order dated October 1, 2024 passed in W.P.A. 16619 of 2024.
2. By the impugned order, learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition of the appellant.
3. Learned senior advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant entered into an agreement to purchase a flat in 9th floor of a building from the private respondent. He submits that till date, appellant did not receive any valid notice to receive possession. He submits that under the terms and conditions of the agreement, liability to pay occupancy charges in respect of the flat concerned commences after the appellant received valid notice for possession. Since the appellant did not receive any valid notice for possession, question of commencement of the liability to pay the occupancy charges by the appellant does not arise.
4. Learned senior advocate appearing for the appellant draws the attention of the Court to the writ petition. He submits that, the building concerned falls within the jurisdiction of Nagadiganta Industrial Township Authority (hereinafter referred to as the concerned municipality for the sake of co
The court upheld the municipality's decision to treat the occupancy certificate as effective from the date of Form J, affirming that plausible administrative decisions should not be interfered with b....
Acceptance of a Declaration under the West Bengal Apartment Ownership Act is invalid if made without proper notice to all concerned parties and adherence to statutory requirements.
The court ruled that the refusal to grant an Occupancy Certificate by CIDCO was arbitrary and unconstitutional, affirming the right of the petitioner society to admit an additional member under appli....
Point of law: Notices were not served on the same day this Court holds that there is no failure of natural justice or compliance with the provisions of Sections 452 and 636 of the Act.
The court ruled that the lack of adherence to procedural fairness in demanding additional lease premium necessitated reconsideration, balancing the interests of both parties.
Exemptions from building rules must comply with procedural requirements; failure to provide natural justice in administrative decisions warrants judicial intervention.
The A.P. Building Rules 2017 do not specify that parking space should be either in the stilt or in the cellar only as per the application and permission obtained.
Compliance with construction permits is necessary for deemed occupancy under the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, entitling the appellant to due process before any enforcement actions.
The court established that tenants cannot be penalized for a developer's non-compliance with statutory obligations, emphasizing the need for authorities to enforce compliance against developers.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
