Back
RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Jahangir Mallick @ Vekel @ Subho – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident of stabbing (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. details of the argument (Para 2) |
| 3. witness accounts (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. defense arguments on child witness (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. credibility of child witness (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 6. conviction upheld (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The present criminal appeal arises out of a judgment of conviction dated 28th November, 2016 and sentence dated 30th November, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Judge, Special Court, Chinsurah, Hooghly in Sessions Trial No. 02(09) of 2015 arising out of Sessions Case No. 98 of 2015 wherein the appellant was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for life.
3. At the relevant point of time PW-2, the granddaughter of the victim was studying inside the house. The conversation between the appellant and the victim took place initially outside the hut where the victim was sitting on the door way. The offence occurred inside the house after the appellan
The court affirmed that child witness testimony, when corroborated by adult witnesses, can be sufficient for conviction in murder cases, emphasizing careful scrutiny of such evidence.
The conviction for murder was upheld based on eyewitness accounts and circumstantial evidence linking the appellants to the crime, affirming that minor inconsistencies in evidence do not undermine th....
Murder - Testimony of sole child witness - There is no age limit fixed for a person to be a competent witness. A child of tender age can also be a competent witness.
The judgment establishes that minor discrepancies in witness testimonies, which do not materially affect the case, cannot be the basis for doubting the prosecution's case.
The prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the reversal of the death penalty.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for complete and conclusive circumstantial evidence to convict an accused, as well as the need for the circumstances to lead to onl....
A conviction in a murder case cannot be sustained on unreliable eyewitness testimony, and the prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The reliability of a child witness's evidence, the need for corroboration, and the significance of medical evidence in establishing guilt in a murder case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
