SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 678

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR
ROHIT B. DEO, URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, JJ.
Anand Prakash Aadtani – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 445 of 2016
Decided On : 22-06-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.R. Agrawal.
For the Respondent: N.S. Rao.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 302 - Murder - Conviction of appellant for murder confirmed; he was sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine for the murder of Ramesh Govindram Chandi, following a violent domestic dispute. (Paras 1-6, 10, 15-19, 63-100)

(B) Legal Principles - Importance of eyewitness testimony in corroborating physical and forensic evidence, and the legal standard for assessing credibility of witnesses, particularly in domestic violence cases. The court found the testimonies of eyewitnesses to be reliable despite some discrepancies. (Paras 36, 48-50)

(C) Findings of Court - Conviction upheld based on substantial eyewitness corroboration and forensic evidence linking the accused to the crime scene through blood evidence and weapon recovery. (Paras 10-19, 63-100)

(D) Issues - Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction of the appellant for murder in the context of a familial conflict, and assessment of witness credibility, specifically family members as eyewitnesses. (Paras 35-100) (E) Ratio Decidendi - The court determined that the relationship of witnesses does not inherently diminish their credibility, as long as their statements are consistent and corroborated by forensic evidence. The court also emphasized the importance of eyewitness accounts in establishing the occurrence and nature of the crime. (Paras 50-90) (F) Result - The appeal against the conviction was dismissed. (Para 101)

JUDGMENT :

URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.

1. Appellant-Anand Prakash Aadtani is assailing judgment dated 14-10-2016 rendered by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial 350/2013 whereby the appellant is convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC) and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to payment of fine of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) and in default of payment to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for three months.

2. Along with appellant, his brother Suraj Prakash Aadtani (A-2) and his mother Madhu Prakash Aadtani (A-3) faced trial. A-2 and A-3 are acquitted.

3. The prosecution case:

    Deceased Ramesh Govindram Chandi was the father of Kanchan (PW4) who is married to A-2 Suraj. Accused were residing jointly. Appellant is married to Mahak and the couple were pursuing the Chartered Accountant (C.A.) course. Kanchan and the appellant and his wife Mahak did not see eye to eye on domestic issues and quarreled frequently. In the fit of anger, Kanchan used to often go to her parental house at Jaripatka, Nagpur.

4. The prosecution narrated all the backdrop and the incidents resulting in the death of Ramesh Chandi, as discernible from the report lodged by Smt. Kanta (PW-1), the widow of the deceased is thus:

    The entire family of the accused used to pick up altercations with Kanchan who was forced to stay with her parents on 7-8 occasions. Fifteen days prior to 21-4-2013, which is the date of incident, Kanchan came to her parental home. At 4.30 p.m. on 21-4-2023, A-2 Suraj came to the parental house of Kanchan and persuaded her to return to her matrimonial home. Kanta called her daughter Kanchan after 30 minutes to enquire whether she was comfortable. Kanchan started crying and she implored Kanta to take her back to the parental house. Kanta and her son Karan went to the house of the accused. A-2 Suraj asked them to take Kanchan along, however, Kanta and Karan assuaged the feelings of Kanchan and did not take her back with them. After returning home, Kanta and the deceased went to Hotel Tuli to attend the party. After the party, while returning home, Kanta called Kanchan to check whether she was fine and again Kanchan started crying and insisting that she be taken back to her parental home immediately. Kanta and the deceased reached the house of the accused in their Fiat Punto car MH-31/DC-5249 at approximately 11.15 p.m. While Kanta and the deceased were proceeding the house of the accused, Kanchan came at the main gate, she was followed by her mother-in-law, appellant and Suraj. Kanchan’s mother-in-law was speaking in enmity and offensive manner. Kanchan asked the deceased to go home and made him to sit in the car and asked her mother Kanta to get in the car. While Kanta was about to take her seat in the car, suddenly, the appellant pushed Kanchan aside and assaulted Ramesh on the cheek, neck and chest with a knife which he had kept hidden in his hand. The appellant struck repeated blows and A-2 and A-3 were instigating the appellant. Since Ramesh was bleeding profusely, Kanta and Kanchan, who were frightened and shocked, removed him from the driving seat and made him lie on the rear seat. Ramesh was taken to the Udasi Hospital where the doctor advised that he be immediately taken to the Mayo Hospital. In the meanwhile, Kanta’s brother Kamal Manwani arrived and it was in his Tavera car that Ramesh was taken to the Mayo Hospital where he was declared dead.

5. On the basis of the report lodged by Kanta, Crime 179/2013 was registered at 1.00 a.m. on 22-4-2013 for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. API Alka Nikalje visited the spot and prepared spot panchanama (Exhibit 56). She collected samples of the plain earth and blood mixed earth and a pen from the spot. Appellant and A-2 were arrested. PI Umesh Besarkar

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top