SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1938 Supreme(Cal) 124

JACK
Karala Valley Tea Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Lachmi Narayan Agarwalla – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Jack, J. - This appeal has arisen out of a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1000 from three defendants. The money was paid to defendant 1 by one Mahadeo (who is the manager of the plaintiff's shop for the sale of bicycles, motor tyres and a gramophone at Jalpaiguri) as earnest money on account of a contract which he purported to enter into with defendant 1 as agent of the plaintiff for taking sub-lease of a tea garden belonging to defendant 1. In the contract it was laid down that if there was default on the part of the plaintiff in completing it, the sum of Rs. 1000 which was paid as earnest money was to be forfeited. As the plaintiff maintains that Mahadeo was not empowered to enter into this contract he repudiates the contract and claims to recover the Rs. 1000 from defendant 1 which defendant 1 maintains he is entitled to retain, the contract not having been completed by the plaintiff. In this appeal it is urged that the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief in the present suit against defendant 1 irrespective of the question whether Mahadeo acted within or beyond the scope of his authority, and that Section 65, Contract Act, was wrongly applied in this case by the J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top