SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1921 Supreme(Cal) 251

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Suhrawardy, J., Newbould, J.
Abdul Salim & Ors. - Appellant
Versus
Emperor - Respondent
Decided On : 14-11-1921

Headnote:

Conspiracy - Marine Recruitment - 120B/420, Indian Penal Code - Summary of Acts and Sections: The judgment discusses the charges of criminal conspiracy under sections 120B/420, Indian Penal Code against the appellants. It also addresses the legality of the trial, misjoinder of charges, and admissibility of evidence. The court's decision upholds the verdict of the Jury and dismisses the appeal.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants were tried for criminal conspiracy under sections 120B/420, Indian Penal Code related to marine recruitment. The case involved the recruitment of men for marine work in Mesopotamia, fraudulent practices, and the formation of a conspiracy among the accused.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the trial was legal, rejected objections related to misjoinder of charges, and upheld the admissibility of evidence. The court concluded that there was no misdirection in the charge to the Jury and dismissed the appeal.

Issues: The issues included the legality of the trial, misjoinder of charges, admissibility of evidence, and misdirection in the charge to the Jury.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the charges of conspiracy and offences committed in pursuance of that conspiracy formed one and the same transaction and could be jointly tried. The court also upheld the admissibility of evidence and found no misdirection in the charge to the Jury.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the sentences passed, stating that they were appropriate to the offences of which the appellants had been convicted.

JUDGMENT

1. The eight appellants and two others were tried before the Additional Sessions Judge of Chittagong and a Special Jury on a charge of criminal conspiracy of other offences under the Indian Penal Code against each of them individually. One of these ten accused, Makbul Ahmed, was acquitted of all the charges framed against him. Eight of the remainder were convicted on the general charge of conspiracy u/s 120B/420, Indian Penal Code, including one Ahmed Kabir who has since died. The second appellant, Ahmed Mia, was acquitted on this charge. All accused except Maqbul Ahmed were convicted on one or more of the charges framed against them individually. In some cases the verdict was nnanimous and in others by a majority of three to two. The appellant, Abdul Salim, has been sentenced to five years rigorous imprisonment under sections 120B/420, Indian Penal Code. The appellant, Ahmed Salim, has been sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment under sections 420/109, Indian Penal Code. The appellants Mohamad Ismail alias Ismial Dovash, Osi Mian and Mohamed Ismail alios Kala Ismail have each been sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment u/s 120B/420, Indian Penal Code, and the appellants Mohamed Nassim, Matiar Rahaman and Yasin have each been sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment u/s 120B/420, Indian Penal Code. No separate sentences have been passed on any of the appellants for the other offences of which they have bean convicted

2. The fasts of the care are somewhat complicated but it is not necessary to set them out in full, since in this appeal we cannot set aside the findings of the Jury on the facts whether the verdict be unanimous or that of a majority. The main facts according to the case for the prosecution are as follows: Daring the War a large number of men were required for marine work as serangs, tindals, sukanis, laskars, ete., in Mesopotamia. At first men were recruited in India for this purpose by the Koyal Indian Marine (R.I.M.) Department at various centres throughout India, The demand for these men, who were technically known as " Marine Ratings" steadily increased and about the middle of August 1916 a new department, sailed the Inland Water Transport (I. W. T ) Department, was created to carry on this work of recruitment. The new department commenced work in October 1916. In February, 1917, Chittagong was made one of the recruiting centres of " Marine Ratings " for service in Mesopotamia. The Recruiting Office in the Chittagong Port Office worked as a branch office of the Calcutta Recruiting Office but was financially independent, Mr. Chudleigh, (P. W. No. 2), Senior Harbour Master, was the Recruiting Officer for the Chittagong centre and as such selected men for Marine service in Mesopotamia. Men getting over Rs. 20 per month were technically termed " Higher Ratings " and the others " Lower Ratings." In selecting recruits for the "Higher Ratings," Mr. Chudleigh made it a rule that all candidates, except those known to him, should produce certificates or testimonials as to their fitness before they were finally selected. The men after their final selection were paid one month's pay in advance and diet allowance. They were then sent to Calcutta with a " watchman " to be made over to the Technical Recruiting. Officer who despatched them to Mesopotamia through the I. W. T. officers in Bombay. This ''watchman " was a servant of one Abdul Rahaman Dohasi who had entered into an agreement with the Secretary of State for India on the 7th February 1917, for the supply of the recruits to serve as "Marine Ratings" in Mesopotamia. Abdul Rahaman was in the position of a sole agent and was entitled to get a commission on the number of men recruited through the Chittagong office whether he himself brought them in or not. But until the men recruited at Chittagong were made over to the Head Office at Calcutta, Abdul Rahaman was responsible for the money advanced to them. At first Ismail Dovash (appellant No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top