SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(Cal) 276

WALMSLEY, MUKERJI
Aniruddha Mana – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Walmsley, J. - The appellants are four brothers Anirudha Mana; Madchab Mana, Gopal Mana and Gobinda Mana. They were all found guilty u/s 147 and u/s 304 (second part) read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code and each of them was sentenced to undergo two years' rigorous imprisonment on the first count and ten years' rigorous imprisonment on the second count, the sentences to run concurrently.

2. The story told for the prosecution was this. On 28th November the complainant Baikanta went to out paddy grown by him on a plot of land which his father had bought many years previously from the aunt of the appellants. He had with him, ten labourers. The appellants and others interfered and when he persisted in cutting the paddy, they assaulted him and the labourers. The result of the assault was that three of the labourers Jitu Das, Kailash Pradhan and Naba Jana received Injuries which proved fatal.

3. The charges framed against the accused by the committing Magistrate were u/s 147 and Section 304, Indian Penal Code. The common object in the former was said to be that "of causing hurt to Baikunta Panda and his men." In the latter the names of the three dead men were inserted in one cha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top