SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(Cal) 116

CUMING, CAMMIADE
Bharat Chandra Pal – Appellant
Versus
Gouranga Chandra Pal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Cammiade, J. - The facts of the present case are as follows : The plaintiff, who is the respondent before this Court, sued one Shuramani and another on a bond in the year 1916 and he obtained an order for attachment before judgment of a raiyati holding belonging to Shuramani. The order which was recorded by the learned Munsif in that case was as follows:

On the application of the plaintiff, supported by an affidavit, I am satisfied that the defendants are about to transfer their properties with a view to defraud the plaintiff. It is, therefore, ordered that notice be issued upon the defendants to show cause within seven days from the service thereof why they should not furnish security for money. In the meantime I also order conditional attachment of the immovable properties mentioned in the plaintiff's application.

2. The order was issued to the peon in form No. 5 of Appendix F, directing the peon, in case securities were not given, to attach the properties. Nothing further was done. Subsequently the defendant in that suit, Shuramani, sold the tenancy to the defendant of the present suit. This was in the year 1920, and in the year 1921 the plaintiff brought the tenancy to sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top