SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(Cal) 265

R. C. MITTER, NARSINGHA RAU
G. P. Stewart – Appellant
Versus
Brojendra Kishore Roy Chaudhury – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Narsingha Rau, J. - Appeal No. 91 of 1939 (F.M.A.) - This is an appeal from an order passed on 31st January 1939 by the Second Subordinate Judge, Sylhet. The appellant is the Collector and Deputy Commissioner of Sylhet in his capacity as manager of the estate of Kumar Gopika Raman Roy, a ward of Court under the Court of Wards, Assam. The respondent is Brojendra Kishore Roy Chaudhury of Gouripore in the District of Mymensingh in Bengal. The facts, so far as they are necessary for the purposes of this appeal, can be briefly stated: The respondent lent to the aforesaid Kumar various sums of money aggregating to Rupees seven lacs on five simple mortgage bonds and obtained a decree thereon for the sale of the mortgaged properties. On 16-11-1938 the learned Subordinate Judge, on an application by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet, stayed execution on the ground that the Court of "Wards in Assam had taken possession of the property of the mortgagor and that in consequence, Section 10-C inserted by the Assam Court of Wards Amendment Act, 1937 (which was passed by the Assam Legislature after 1st April 1937) operated as a bar to execution. Subsequently,' there was an application on beh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top