SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1922 Supreme(Cal) 330

LANCELOT SANDERSON, PANTON
Radha Nath Karmakar – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Lancelot Sanderson, C.J. - This is a Rule calling upon the District Magistrate to show cause why the convictions of and sentences passed upon the petitioners should not be set aside on the first ground mentioned in the petition; and the first ground is, that "the trial of the petitioners on charges framed in contravention of Section 233, Criminal Procedure Code, was without jurisdiction and void and the convictions bad and sentences and orders u/s 106 of the Criminal Procedure Code passed on such trial are illegal and fit to be quashed."

2. The charges, (as they appear from the petition) against the petitioners, who are 14 in number, were, first, u/s 147 of the Indian Penal Code, secondly, u/s 149 read with Sections 325 and 323, and, thirdly, against some of the petitioners u/s 353 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Vakil for the petitioners raised no objection to the charge u/s 147 of the Indian Penal Code and that is the section under which the petitioners have been sentenced. Some of the petitioners have been convicted in respect of the other charges, but no separate sentences have been passed in respect thereof.

3. The objection, which the learned Vakil for the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top