SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1916 Supreme(Cal) 22

WALMSLEY, CHITTY
Nishi Kanta Pal – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. In this case we have read the explanation of the Magistrate, but we still adhere to our opinion that the conviction and sentences on the petitioners cannot stand on the grounds on which the Rule was granted. No offence u/s 186, Indian Penal Code, appears to have been committed. The Rule is made absolute. The fines, if paid, will be refunded.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top