SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(Cal) 170

MALLIK, JACK
Niharmala Debee – Appellant
Versus
Sarojebandhu Bhattacharjya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mallik, J. - This appeal arises out of a suit for declaration of title to some lands and for recovery of possession of the same The property originally belonged to one Kamaladdi Mandal and his brothers. About 1888 one of the brothers and the heirs of the other brothers mortgaged the property to one Surjyakanta Bhattacharjya, the maternal grandfather of the plaintiffs. Surjyakanta, in October 1888, executed a will, by which he devised his properties to his daughter Gopendrabala Debee and died. Gopendrabala, in 1889, took probate of the will. In June 1891 the mortgagors executed an instalment mortgage bond in favour of Gopendrabala. In the year 1895 a rent suit was brought against the mortgagors for the rent of the lands, a decree was obtained and, when the property was put up to sale in execution of the decree, one Ahmaddi purchased one-half share of the holding, thereby acquiring the right, title, and interest of the mortgagors of the property and becoming the holder of the equity of redemption in respect of one-half share of the property. In the year 1901 the plaintiffs who, as I have said before, are the sons of Gopendrabala, the daughter of Surjyakanta, instituted a suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top