SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(Cal) 240

PAL, NASIM ALI
Smt. Radharani Dassi – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Binodamoyee Dassi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Nasim Ali, J. - The following genealogy about which there is no dispute will explain the facts of the case:

       __________________________________       |            |                   |    Abmas        Khelaram              Nibarn   (died in      (died in             (died in   1315 B. S.)   Kartic               Falgoon                 1326 B.S.)           1336 B.S.)     ______________________________     |     |              |             |     |   Rabi            Atul         Upen    |               (Defendant 1)            |                       _________________|                       |        _______________|_________________        |            |         |         |       Charu       Maitra     Rajani    Sajani                                       (Defendant 2)

2. The facts which are not in dispute in this appeal are these: Abinash acquired the properties included in Schedule Ka of the plaint, with his own earnings. As he had no son he and his wife liked defendants 1 and 2 very much. The latter used to live at the house of Abinash during his life-time. After Abinash's death Binoda Moyee being an illiterate pardanashih lady, the properties inherited by her from Ab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top