SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1942 Supreme(Cal) 6

PAL, B. K. MUKHERJEA
Baidyanath Nandi – Appellant
Versus
Shyama Sundar Nandi managing shebait of Sri Sri Iswar Lakshmi Janardan Thakur – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.K. Mukherjea, J. - These two rules are directed against certain orders of the Subordinate Judge, First Court, 24-Parga-nas, made in Title Suit No. 53 of 1940 pending before him by which permission was refused to the petitioners, who are some of the plaintiffs in that suit, to withdraw from it and to have their names struck off the record as parties plaintiffs. The suit was instituted by a large number of persons who purported to be shebaits of a certain deity known as Lakshmi Janardan Jew established by the Nandis of Jamgram in the district of Hooghly and the defendants are all co-shebaits of the plaintiffs. The prayers in the plaint are of a twofold character. The first prayer is for a declaration that plaintiff 1 has been duly elected one of the managing shebaits of the deity in place of defendant 1 who has been validly removed by the majority of the shebaits in accordance with the provisions of the deed of endowment. The second and the alternative prayer is for removal of defendant 1 as one of the managing shebaits, by the Court, if lie has not been validly removed by his co-shebaits already, on grounds of misappropriation and breach of trust. On 24th February 1941 two

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top