SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1922 Supreme(Cal) 196

LANCELOT SANDERSON, WILLIAM TEUNON, THOMES RICHARDSON, NEWBOULD, GHOSE
Ram Sagar Mondal – Appellant
Versus
Alek Naskar and Bhola Nath Mondal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Lancelot Sanderson, C.J. - This is a Reference to a Full Bench by my learned brothers Newbould and Suhrawardy, JJ. The questions which are submitted are:

1.When in proceedings u/s 133, Criminal Procedure Code, arising out of an alleged obstruction of a way used by the public, the defendant sets up a claim of right which is found by the Magistrate to be made in good faith, is the Magistrate's jurisdiction entirely ousted?

2.Or can the Magistrate, if he does not think this claim well-founded though he considers it made in good faith, allow the defendant a reasonable time to assert this claim by a civil suit and if he does not go to the Civil Court within such time or fails there, can the Magistrate continue the proceedings u/s 133, Criminal Procedure Code?

Was the case of Belat Ali v. Abdur Rahim 8 C.W.N. 143 : 1 Cr. L.J. 70 giving effect to the dictum in Luckhee Narain Banerjee v. Ram Kumar 15 C. 604 at p. 570. 7 Ind. Dec. 960 rightly decided?

2. The following facts may be taken from the case:

This Rule is directed against an order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Alipore in proceedings u/s 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Ali Nashkar and others instituted proce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top