SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1877 Supreme(Cal) 36

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Macpherson, J.
Roychurn Dutt - Appellant
Versus
Ameena Bibi - Respondent
Decided On : 23-05-1877

Headnote:

Poundage - Sheriff - Compromise - Act Section List - The court held that the sheriff was entitled to poundage upon the sum actually compromised for, and granted the application subject to such payment of poundage to the sheriff.

Fact of the Case:

The case involves a dispute over the sheriff's entitlement to poundage on a compromised sum.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the sheriff was entitled to poundage upon the sum actually compromised for, and granted the application subject to such payment of poundage to the sheriff.

Issues: The key issue was whether the sheriff was entitled to poundage on the compromised sum.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the principle that the sheriff should be paid poundage on the amount actually compromised for.

Final Decision: The court granted the application subject to the payment of poundage to the sheriff, and the sheriff was awarded the costs of the application.

JUDGMENT

Macpherson, J. - The Court was of opinion that the Sheriff' was entitled to poundage upon the sum actually compromised for, and granted the application subject to such payment of poundage to the Sheriff. The Sheriff' to have the costs of the application.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top