SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1872 Supreme(Cal) 48

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Bhairabdan Ramchand - Appellant
Versus
Bassantlal Bhagat - Respondent
Decided On : 31-08-1872

Headnote:

Summons - Small Cause Court - Act IX of 1850, s. 26, s. 41 - Rules 2, 3, 63 - The court held that the summons must be served at least two clear days before the trial, as per Rule 3, and the Judge cannot override this provision by ordering a shorter service period. The court also held that the Rules cannot override the provisions of the Act, and the Act requires a fixed time for service.

Fact of the Case:

The Judge of the Small Cause Court set aside the proceedings, holding that a summons returnable in less than two days was irregular under Act IX of 1850, s. 26. The defendant argued that there was no good defense on the merits and a new trial should not be granted.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the summons was not properly served as it was returnable in less than two days, violating Rule 3 of the Small Cause Court. The court also found that the Rules cannot override the provisions of the Act, and the Act requires a fixed time for service.

Issues: Whether a summons returnable in less than two days is irregular under Act IX of 1850, s. 26. Whether the Judge can override the Rules by ordering a shorter service period.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Act IX of 1850, s. 26, and Rule 3 of the Small Cause Court to require a minimum of two clear days between service of the summons and the trial date. The court held that the Judge cannot override this provision by ordering a shorter service period. The court also held that the Rules cannot override the provisions of the Act, and the Act requires a fixed time for service.

Final Decision: The court upheld the Judge's decision to set aside the proceedings, finding the summons irregular.

JUDGMENT

Sir Richard Couch, Kt. C.J.

1. In this case the Judge of the Small Cause Court has set aside the proceeding subject to the opinion of this Court on the question whether he was correct in holding that a summons, returnable in less than two days, is irregular under Act IX of 1850, s. 26. With reference to the objection that it does not appear that there is a good defence on the merits of the case, and therefore a new trial ought not to be granted, we must consider that the Judge is satisfied that it is a proper case for getting aside the judgment if the summons was irregular, and s. 53 gives power to the Judges in every case whatever, if they shall think fit, to order a new trial. We think the meaning of s. 26 is that the time between the service of the summons and the day on which the Court is hold on which the cause is to be tried, shall in all cases be fixed by the Rules for regulating the practice of the Court. The only time fixed by Rule 3 is two clear days. The words "unless the Court shall otherwise order" do not fix any other time, but give the power in any case to disregard the rule and the Act, and to have the summons served at any time before the trial S. 41 does not in our opinion authorize this. The Rules for regulating the practice and proceeding of the Court, cannot override the provisions of the Act, and dispense with fixing a time for the service when the Act has expressly required that it should be done. In our opinion the summons in this case was not properly served, and the judgment was irregular.

------Footnote-------

1 The following sections of Act IX of 1850, and Rules of Practice of the Calcutta Small Cause Court are material for the purpose of this report:--

Act IX of 1850, s. 26.--On the application of any person desirous to bring a suit under this Act, the Clerk of the Court shall issue, under the seal of the Court, a summons which shall be numbered, and shall set forth the names of the plaintiff and defendant, the cause of action, with such particulars as shall be, from time to time, directed by the rules of the Court, and the amount sued for and shall be served on the defendant so many days before the day on which the Court shall be hold at which the cause is to be tried as shall he directed by the rules for regulating the practice of the Court; and delivery of such summons to the defendant, or in such other manner as shall be specified in the rules of practice shall be deemed good service..........

Act IX of 1860 s. 41--The Judges of each Court, holder under this Act, subject to the approval of the Judges of the Supreme Court, shall have power1to make and is one all the general rules for regulating the practice and proceeding of the Court,.............. and from time to time to alter any such rule.....................; and the rules so made...................shall be observed..............in the Court of that Presidency, and shall be sent to the Supreme Court for approval, but shall be of force until disapproved.................

Rule 2.--The summons to appear to suite or action shall be issued according to the forms in the schedule, and shall be dated as of the day when issued Summonses shall be made return-able on the seventh day, but may be made returnable in a shorter or longer period, at the discretion of the Judge.

Rule 3.--Every such summons to appear to a unit or action shall be served by one of the bailiffs of the Court two clear days before the holding of the Court at which it shall be made returnable, unless the Court shall otherwise order.

Rule 6.--When any defendant shall, by keeping his house, place of abode, or place of business closed, or by absconding or by violence or threats, prevent any bailiffs from serving any summons to appear to a suit or action as herein before directed, and such summons shall have been conspicuously fixed on, or near to, such place of (sic) or place of business, or otherwise served as nearly as may be according to the mode herein before directed, such servic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top