SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(Cal) 50

ROXBURGH, B. K. MUKHERJEA
Jaikarandas Agarwalla – Appellant
Versus
Protapsing Agarwalla – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.K. Mukherjea, J. - This is an appeal on behalf of defendants 2 and 3 and it arises out of a suit commenced by the plaintiff for enforcement of a mortgage bond. The facts lie within a short compass and are, for the most part, undisputed. The defendant 1 executed a mortgage bond in favour of the plaintiff on 15th January 1935 to secure a loan of Rs. 2500. Shortly after this defendants 2 and 3 obtained a money decree against defendant 1 for a sum of about Rs. 1299 in the Court of the Munsif at Jalpaiguri. The date of the decree is 7th February 1935. The decree was executed in money execution Case No. 58 of 1935 and the properties included in the mortgage bond were attached on 22nd February 1935. The plaintiff mortgagee preferred a claim but it was dismissed for default as he did not appear at the date of hearing. In the result the attached properties were sold and they were purchased by defendants 2 and 3 for a sum of about Rs. 300 only. The plaintiff has now instituted the present suit and has prayed for sale of the mortgaged property and also for setting aside the order of dismissal for default passed in the claim proceeding. The suit was contested by defendants 2 and 3 on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top