BUCKLAND, ASHUTOSH MOOKERJEE
Sarojini Das – Appellant
Versus
Haridas Ghosh-Defendant – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Asutosh Mookerjee, J. - The subject matter of the litigation which has resulted in this appeal is the estate left by one Rajanimani alias Rajanibala Dasi, a Hindu lady, who died on the 21st March 1917. She left a son Nitai, a grandson Anil, by a predeceased son, and three married daughters. The relationship of the several members of the family is indicated on the following genealogical table:
RAJANIMANI, CR RAINIBALAM. ABINASH CHANDRA GHOSESatish Nitai Ranibala Kalibala PrabhasiniChandra Chandra M. Nagen- M, Krish- M. Satyes- Ghose, Ghose. dra Nath na Chandra war Pal.died 1906 Pal, Ghose. Widow Sarojini,(Propounder)Anil ChandraGhose.
2. The case for the appellant is that, three days before her death, Rajanimani made a testamentary disposition of her properties. On the 20th August 1917 an application for Probate was lodged in the Court of the District Delegate by the present appellant, Sarojini, the widowed daughter in law of the deceased, but it was returned as objection was filed. An application for Letters of Administration with a copy of the Will annexed was consequently presented to the District Judge on the lath October 1917, Objection was thereupon lodged on the 22u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.