SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1921 Supreme(Cal) 272

BUCKLAND, ASHUTOSH MOOKERJEE
Sarojini Das – Appellant
Versus
Haridas Ghosh-Defendant – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Asutosh Mookerjee, J. - The subject matter of the litigation which has resulted in this appeal is the estate left by one Rajanimani alias Rajanibala Dasi, a Hindu lady, who died on the 21st March 1917. She left a son Nitai, a grandson Anil, by a predeceased son, and three married daughters. The relationship of the several members of the family is indicated on the following genealogical table:

RAJANIMANI, CR RAINIBALAM. ABINASH CHANDRA GHOSESatish  Nitai Ranibala Kalibala PrabhasiniChandra Chandra M. Nagen- M, Krish- M. Satyes- Ghose, Ghose. dra Nath na Chandra war Pal.died 1906   Pal,  Ghose. Widow Sarojini,(Propounder)Anil ChandraGhose.

2. The case for the appellant is that, three days before her death, Rajanimani made a testamentary disposition of her properties. On the 20th August 1917 an application for Probate was lodged in the Court of the District Delegate by the present appellant, Sarojini, the widowed daughter in law of the deceased, but it was returned as objection was filed. An application for Letters of Administration with a copy of the Will annexed was consequently presented to the District Judge on the lath October 1917, Objection was thereupon lodged on the 22u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top