SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(Cal) 298

BARABHUM
Protap Chandra Deo Dhanbal Deb – Appellant
Versus
Sri Raja Jagadish Chandra Deo Dhabal Deb – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This appeal arises out of a suit for declaration of title to and recovery of possession of the Dhalbhum Raja Estate, for mesne profits and other reliefs. The plaintiff Jagadish Chandra Deo Dhabal claimed the estate under the will of Raja Satrughna Deo Dhabal dated the 11th May 1905. The properties belonging to the estate are situated partly in Singbhum, and partly in the district of Midnapur.

2. The parties are governed by the Mitakshara School of Hindu Law, and their ancestors are said to have migrated from Rajputna, centuries ago. The history of the family is stated in Mohesh Chander Dhal v. Satrughan Dhal (1901) 29 Cal. 343 and a geneological table is given at page 344. The defendant Protap Chandra is descended from one Jugal Kishore who belonged to the main family and the plaintiff is descended from one Raja Karnala Kant the brother of Jugal Kishore, who founded the Jambuni branch of the family.

3. The Dhalbhum Raj is an impartible estate, the succession to which has devolved by family and local custom according to the rule of lineal primogeniture from ancient times. The estate was settled by the British Government with Raja Jagannath, the ancestor of the parties at a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top