SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1936 Supreme(Cal) 454

R. C. MITTER, M. C. GHOSE
Bhadreswar Coal Supply Co. – Appellant
Versus
Satis Chandra Nandi and Co. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.C. Mitter, J. - In this case a suit was brought for the recovery of the price of coal supplied to the defendants who were partners of a firm carrying on business under the name and style of Satis Chandra Nandy and Company. The cause title of the plaint was as follows:

Bhadreswari Coal Supply Company through Manik Lal Roy, plaintiff v. Satis Chandra Nandy and Company represented by Jnanendra Nath Nandy and others, defendants.

2. At the date of the suit three persons namely Manik Lal Roy, Sripati Charan Mukherjee and Bhujendra Nath Bhadra were partners of a firm carrying on business under the name of Bhadreswar Coal Supply Company. They were also partners of the same firm carrying on business under the same firm name when the defendant Company bought the coal. The finding of the learned District Judge is that the said partnership of Manik Lal Roy, Sripati Charan Mukherjee and Bhujendra Nath Bhadra commenced under a deed of partnership and the partnership was still continuing at the date of the suit. To the suit as originally framed Sripat Charan Mukherjee and Bhujendra Nath Bhadra were added as pro forma defendants, but the notice of the suit was not served on them and ultim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top