SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1934 Supreme(Cal) 402

MITTER
Gopi Krishna Saha – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Nath Chaudhury – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mitter, J. - This is an appeal u/s 15, Letters Patent, from a judgment of my learned brother S.K. Ghose, J. The suit in which this appeal arises was brought by the plaintiff who is the appellant before us for additional rent for excess area. The Court of first instance dismissed the suit. The lower appellate Court gave a modified decree to the plaintiff granting additional rent for an excess of 70 bighas odd only. On appeal to this Court, S.K. Ghose, J., has allowed the appeal and has restored the decree of the Munsiff, dismissing the plaintiff's suit. Hence this present appeal u/s 15, Letters Patent.

2. The plaintiff's case is that he has purchased the Putni and Dar Putni rights of mouza Chatiani in the year 1334 B.S. The defendants are said to be the holders of a jote bearing rent of Rs. 34-10-8 per year. The case made by the plaintiff in the plaint further is that this rent was assessed with reference to an area of 78 bighas odd without specific boundaries on a standard of 18 inches to a cubit and that the jama was not a mokarary jama. It was further stated that according to the finally published record-of-rights, which records were published in 1925, the defendants are p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top