SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1921 Supreme(Cal) 48

TEUNON, SUHRAWARDY
Shahabaj Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Bhajahari Nath – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This Rule arises out of certain proceedings instituted under the provisions of Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code. These proceedings refer to a tank known as Mirsagar and to a dwelling house which, we are informed, is now more or less dilapidated. It appears that in execution of a decree obtained against the predecessor of the petitioners before us, who were the, first party to the proceedings u/s 145, these properties and other properties were sold, and were purchased by the members of the second party who are the opposite parties in this Rule. It has then been found by the Trial Magistrate that on the 17th November 1918 the auction-purchasers obtained possession of the tank through the Civil Court. That possession was taken in the lifetime of the judgment-debtor, who is said to have died some five days after the delivery of possession.

2. It has next been found that the auction-purchaser took possession of the residential house on the 16th May 1920. In the execution proceedings terminating in the delivery of possession of the house the petitioners Nos. 1 and 2, the son and widow of the original judgment-debtor, were impleaded as parties. The Section 145 proceedings we

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top