IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
Biswajit Basu, J.
Jashimuddin Mondal & Ors. – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
WPA 1089 of 2023 with I.A. CAN 06 of 2023 I.A. CAN 07 of 2023, WPA 1162 OF 2025
Decided On : 17-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to teacher appointments and regularization. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on illegal appointment processes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. examination of statutory compliance and authority in teacher appointments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. discussion on the implications of political unrest in appointments. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. rejection of appointments violating constitutional schemes. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT :
Biswajit Basu, J.
1. The petitioners are educated unemployed youth of the State of West Bengal. They, except the petitioner no. 1 in WPA 1089 of 2023, are residing in the area under the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (hereinafter referred to as the ‘GTA’ in short) and other hill districts of West Bengal. The petitioners are alleging that the vacant posts of teachers in the Government aided and sponsored schools of the said area have been filled up through backdoor without following any selection process, they are praying that all of such appointments be set aside. The petitioners are also challenging the legality and propriety of the letter bearing no. 254-SE/S/4A-1B/15(PT-III) dated March 08, 2019 whereby and whereunder the engagements of 313 voluntary teachers in Secondary/Higher Secondary Schools under GTA were regularized by the Principle Secretary, School Education Department, Government of West Bengal.
2. The petitioners are alleging large scale corruption in the said regularization of such teachers. The State, in its affidavit has disclosed that the regularization of the engagement of the said 313 voluntary teachers was approved only in-principle but without waiting for the final approval of the State, the engagement of those teachers was regularised. In view of such stand of the State, the challenge to the said letter dated March 08, 2019 is taken up for disposal first, keeping the other issues involved in the writ petitions pending for consideration later.
The argument of the learned counsel for the parties on the said challenge is recorded in seriatim herein below:-
3. Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, learned senior counsel for the petitioners:-
i. The Executive Director of the GTA by a memo bearing No. 302(899)/GTA-EDCN/2017-2018 dated June 25, 2018 had communicated to all Headmistress/Headmaster/Head Teacher of all secondary, primary and upper primary level of schools under the GTA that it came to the notice of the authority that in many cases, the persons have been engaged as voluntary teachers without having requisite qualifications whimsically and in violation of the Order No. 01/I-2/EDN/DGHC/2010-11 dated July 30, 2010 of the Secretary, Education Department of DGHC, such engagement of voluntary teachers is in contradiction of the mandates of the Government of West Bengal and other appropriate authorities, henceforth such engagements would be considered as the personal liability of the Head of the Institution and its Managing Committee. Inspite of such caution, voluntary teachers were engaged and their engagements have been regularized without following any selection process. The petitioners therefore are praying that the engagement and regularization of the appointment of such teachers in GTA area be investigated by any independent agency and all appointments made after the aforementioned order dated July 30, 2010 be set aside.
ii. The State, in its affidavit-in-opposition to the writ petition, has disclosed that the appointment of 469 volunteer teachers were regularised by the Government through Cabinet approval. The communication dated March 08, 2019 discloses that the Government has taken a decision to regularise 313 more volunteer teachers. The State in the said affidavit has categorically stated that the State had principally decided to regularise the appointment of the 313 volunteer teachers but before any final decision in this regard by the Cabinet or by the Finance Department can be made, the District Inspector o
Appointments made in violation of statutory provisions are void ab initio, reinforcing the requirement for lawful selection processes in public employment to uphold Articles 14 and 16 rights.
Regularization of teacher appointments without adhering to established legal recruitment processes is invalid, emphasizing procedural integrity in public service roles, particularly amid political un....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's long service as a Trained Graduate Teacher against a substantive vacant post and the Government's decision to declare the non....
The court established that adherence to prescribed procedures and principles of natural justice is essential in administrative decision-making, particularly in matters affecting the rights of individ....
The court ruled that the termination of ad hoc teachers' services based on the Government Order was unjust and mandated fresh consideration of their regularization claims under the relevant statutory....
The appointment of the petitioners was found to be irregular but not illegal. The State respondents were bound to consider the recommendation of the Special Class-III DPC, which was constituted on th....
Recognition and financial aid for educational institutions must align with equitable staff employment and ensure compliance with established legal conditions for staff remuneration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.