SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 225

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
Biswajit Basu, J.
Jashimuddin Mondal & Ors. – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
WPA 1089 of 2023 with I.A. CAN 06 of 2023 I.A. CAN 07 of 2023, WPA 1162 OF 2025
Decided On : 17-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Mr. Samim Ahmed, Mr. Arka Maity, Mr. Ambiya Khatun.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sirsanya Bandyopadhyay, Mr. Debopriyo Karan, Dr. Sutanu Kumar Patra, Mr. Arijit Majumdar, Mr. Bibek Dutta, Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya, Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, Ld. DSGI, Mr. Iqbal Kabir, Mr. Joydip Kar, Mr. Kaushik Gupta, As Amicus Curie, Mr. Ooiseeroop Sinha, Mr. Pijush Biswas, Mr. Regan Llama, Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ld. APP, Mr. Soumya Majumdar, Mr. Suman Dey, Mr. Tamoghna Pramanick, Mrs. Supriya Dubey, Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya, Ms. Neelanjana Ghorui

Appointments made in violation of statutory provisions are void ab initio, reinforcing the requirement for lawful selection processes in public employment to uphold Articles 14 and 16 rights.

Headnote:(A) West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997 - Appointment and Regularization of Teachers - The court found the regularization of 313 voluntary teachers in Government aided schools was executed without a lawful selection process, violating statutory provisions and Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. (Paras 3, 10, 12, 23, 24, 26)

(B) Regularization of Employment - The Supreme Court ruled that appointments contrary to statutory requirements are void ab initio. (Para 26)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners allege corruption in the appointment of 313 voluntary teachers after 2019, challenging the legality of the process violating the established norms. (Para 1)

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the regularization was illegal since the teachers were engaged without following necessary legal guidelines. (Paras 10, 12)

Issues: The main issues were whether the regularization of teachers was lawful and whether the petitioners had standing in the case. (Paras 23)

Ratio Decidendi: The court asserted that the appointments, lacking compliance with lawful procedures, denied equal employment rights to eligible candidates, reaffirming the principle against subversion of legal norms in public employment. (Paras 23, 26, 30)

Result: The court quashed the regularization of the teachers and set aside the notification approving their appointments.

Table of Content
1. challenge to teacher appointments and regularization. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on illegal appointment processes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. examination of statutory compliance and authority in teacher appointments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. discussion on the implications of political unrest in appointments. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. rejection of appointments violating constitutional schemes. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

Biswajit Basu, J.

1. The petitioners are educated unemployed youth of the State of West Bengal. They, except the petitioner no. 1 in WPA 1089 of 2023, are residing in the area under the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (hereinafter referred to as the ‘GTA’ in short) and other hill districts of West Bengal. The petitioners are alleging that the vacant posts of teachers in the Government aided and sponsored schools of the said area have been filled up through backdoor without following any selection process, they are praying that all of such appointments be set aside. The petitioners are also challenging the legality and propriety of the letter bearing no. 254-SE/S/4A-1B/15(PT-III) dated March 08, 2019 whereby and whereunder the engagements of 313 voluntary teachers in Secondary/Higher Secondary Schools under GTA were regularized by the Principle Secretary, School Education Department, Government of West Bengal.

2. The petitioners are alleging large scale corruption in the said regularization of such teachers. The State, in its affidavit has disclosed that the regularization of the engagement of the said 313 voluntary teachers was approved only in-principle but without waiting for the final approval of the State, the engagement of those teachers was regularised. In view of such stand of the State, the challenge to the said letter dated March 08, 2019 is taken up for disposal first, keeping the other issues involved in the writ petitions pending for consideration later.

The argument of the learned counsel for the parties on the said challenge is recorded in seriatim herein below:-

3. Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, learned senior counsel for the petitioners:-

i. The Executive Director of the GTA by a memo bearing No. 302(899)/GTA-EDCN/2017-2018 dated June 25, 2018 had communicated to all Headmistress/Headmaster/Head Teacher of all secondary, primary and upper primary level of schools under the GTA that it came to the notice of the authority that in many cases, the persons have been engaged as voluntary teachers without having requisite qualifications whimsically and in violation of the Order No. 01/I-2/EDN/DGHC/2010-11 dated July 30, 2010 of the Secretary, Education Department of DGHC, such engagement of voluntary teachers is in contradiction of the mandates of the Government of West Bengal and other appropriate authorities, henceforth such engagements would be considered as the personal liability of the Head of the Institution and its Managing Committee. Inspite of such caution, voluntary teachers were engaged and their engagements have been regularized without following any selection process. The petitioners therefore are praying that the engagement and regularization of the appointment of such teachers in GTA area be investigated by any independent agency and all appointments made after the aforementioned order dated July 30, 2010 be set aside.

ii. The State, in its affidavit-in-opposition to the writ petition, has disclosed that the appointment of 469 volunteer teachers were regularised by the Government through Cabinet approval. The communication dated March 08, 2019 discloses that the Government has taken a decision to regularise 313 more volunteer teachers. The State in the said affidavit has categorically stated that the State had principally decided to regularise the appointment of the 313 volunteer teachers but before any final decision in this regard by the Cabinet or by the Finance Department can be made, the District Inspector o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top