Mukesh Kumar Jain vs Dilip Kumar Modi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Cal) 290

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Mukesh Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Kumar Modi – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Subhasis Sengupta, Adv. Mr. Shounak Mukhopadhyay, Adv. Mr. Dhiraj Kr. Gupta, Adv. Mr. . Swarup Saha, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Biswajib Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Avirup Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Rishav Das, Adv. Mr. Soham Sen, Adv

Table of Content
1. application for intervention. (Para 1)
2. claims of inheritance and will. (Para 2 , 3)
3. opposition to applicant's claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. advocates present arguments on property. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. claims of imposture and forgery. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 15)
6. allegations of fraud complicating proceedings. (Para 11 , 14 , 17)
7. court's observations on addition of parties. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
8. determining proper party based on will. (Para 24)
9. conclusion allowing the application. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)

Judgment :

BISWAROOP CHOWDHUR, J.

This application is filed by the applicant/intervener praying for the following reliefs:

a) Condone the delay if any;

b) The applicant be impleaded as party defendant to the instant suit;

c) Upon impleading the applicant as party defendant to the instant suit, the department of this Hon’ble Court be directed to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title of the plaint filed in the instant suit, within such period as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.

d) Upon impleading the applicant as party defendant to the instant suit and amendments in the cause title of the Plaint filed in the instant suit within such perio