SANDEEP SHARMA
Jit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kirpal Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Sandeep Sharma, J.)
1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with order dated 17.1.2019, passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Una, District Una, H.P., whereby an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC, having been filed by the respondents-plaintiffs ( herein after referred to as “the plaintiffs”), came to be allowed, petitioner-defendant (herein after referred to as “the defendant”), has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying therein to set-aside aforesaid impugned order.
2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record are that, plaintiffs namely S/s Kirpal Singh, Kashmir Singh, Gian Chand, Smt. Lag Devi, Sh. Mohinder Singh and Saroj Kumari filed suit bearing No. 823/13 for declaration and permanent injunction under Sections 34 to 38 of the Specific Reliefs Act, averring therein that they alongwith defendant No.1-Jit Singh i.e. petitioner herein and proforma respondent No.7 i.e. Rumal Singh, are owner in possession of the total land measuring 1-25-33, being LRs of late Sh. Harnam Singh i.e. real brother of the plaintiff No.1, respondent No.4 and respondent No.7
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.