Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Tanmoy Banerjee – Appellant
Versus
Shirine Banerjee – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial case details and residence of minor (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. jurisdiction based on 'ordinary residence' (Para 4 , 9) |
| 3. 'ordinarily resides' definition and implications (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's authority and decision justification (Para 14) |
| 5. final decision and dismissal of application (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.
1. The petitioner has assailed the order no. 15 dated 12.10. 2023 passed in Misc. Case No.29 of 2022.
2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner preferred an application under section 9 of the Guardian and Wards Act, before learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court III, Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas.
3. Opposite party/wife submitted that the opposite party/mother and the ward are resident at present at Bhubenewar and they are residing therein since first weeks of January, 2022 and the ward is presently studying in class VII of St. Xavier’s International High School at Patia Bhubeneswar.
4. Learned court below by the impugned order observed that mere factual residence at a place at the time of proceeding is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction of the expression “ordinarily resides” appearing in
Minor's 'ordinarily resides' jurisdiction determined by stable residence, not temporary placement; welfare of the child paramount.
Jurisdiction for custody petitions lies where the child ordinarily resides, not merely where parents are located; interpretation of relevant statutes must prioritize the child's actual living circums....
Jurisdiction for custody applications is determined by the minor's ordinary residence, not the deemed custody with the mother under personal law.
Territorial jurisdiction of Court – Minor may be in deemed custody of mother but for the purpose of determining jurisdiction, it is ordinary residence of minor that would be relevant.
Jurisdiction for guardianship applications is determined by the minor's ordinary residence, requiring careful evidence assessment.
The 'ordinary residence' of children determines jurisdiction in custody matters under the Act of 1890.
The jurisdiction for custody applications under the Guardian and Wards Act depends on the child's actual residence, distinct from natural guardianship provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
