SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 13

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Kalyani Saraswat (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
Gajendra – Respondent


Advocates:
Makbool Ahmad Mansoori for petitioner;
Ajay Kumar Mimrot for respondent No. 1.

ORDER

1. This Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 8.2.2021, passed in MJC-G.W./03/2020 by Additional District Judge, Nagda, District - Ujjain (MP), whereby the petitioner’s application filed under section 9 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 (for short ‘the Act of 1890’) raising the ground of territorial jurisdiction to entertain the application filed by the respondent No.1/husband for guardianship and custody of their daughter has been rejected and it is held that Court at Nagda shall have the jurisdiction and not the Court at Nagpur where according to the petitioner, the daughter is residing.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the petitioner and the respondent No.1 are husband and wife and they had a dispute which led to the petitioner leaving her matrimonial house at Nagda along with her daughter in the month of April 2020, to Nagpur where her parents are residing. Since the petitioner did not return, therefore on 28.8.2020 the respondent No.1/husband filed an application under section 7, 10 and 12 of the Act of 1890, seeking his appointment as guardian of the minor girl and cust

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top